A Quantitative Analysis of Scholarly Monograph Publishing by University Presses in Korea

Wonsik Shim, Seulki Do, S. Lee
{"title":"A Quantitative Analysis of Scholarly Monograph Publishing by University Presses in Korea","authors":"Wonsik Shim, Seulki Do, S. Lee","doi":"10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.3.309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholarly monographs have been a main vehicle for knowledge representation and transfer as well as an important research outcome. University presses have long been considered as the last bastion for scholarly monographs that have low commercial prospect. Until now there has not been a systematic data analysis regarding scholarly monograph production by university presses in Korea. In this paper, we collected bibliographic records of university presses’ monograph publications between 1950 and 2015 using the National Library of Korea’s online catalog system. A total of 21,015 records were used in the analysis. In particular, for monographs published between 2001 and 2015, we categorized them into scholarly monographs and non-scholarly monographs. University presses’ publishing showed sharp increase during the 1990’s but is in decline after its peak in 2005. University presses seem to have engaged in publishing more non-scholarly monographs than scholarly monographs by a ratio of 6:4. Large university presses in size seem to produce higher proportions of scholarly monographs than smaller presses. In terms of authoring types, single authorship accounts for the highest proportion and on the increase. However, edited books are losing ground as translated books seem to hold steady. Monographs in social sciences have been published more frequently than any other subject areas as there seem to be significant discrepancies among subject areas in terms of the scholarly monograph proportion.","PeriodicalId":179590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Korean Society for Library and Information Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Korean Society for Library and Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.3.309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholarly monographs have been a main vehicle for knowledge representation and transfer as well as an important research outcome. University presses have long been considered as the last bastion for scholarly monographs that have low commercial prospect. Until now there has not been a systematic data analysis regarding scholarly monograph production by university presses in Korea. In this paper, we collected bibliographic records of university presses’ monograph publications between 1950 and 2015 using the National Library of Korea’s online catalog system. A total of 21,015 records were used in the analysis. In particular, for monographs published between 2001 and 2015, we categorized them into scholarly monographs and non-scholarly monographs. University presses’ publishing showed sharp increase during the 1990’s but is in decline after its peak in 2005. University presses seem to have engaged in publishing more non-scholarly monographs than scholarly monographs by a ratio of 6:4. Large university presses in size seem to produce higher proportions of scholarly monographs than smaller presses. In terms of authoring types, single authorship accounts for the highest proportion and on the increase. However, edited books are losing ground as translated books seem to hold steady. Monographs in social sciences have been published more frequently than any other subject areas as there seem to be significant discrepancies among subject areas in terms of the scholarly monograph proportion.
韩国大学出版社学术专著出版数量分析
学术专著是知识表达和转移的主要载体,也是重要的研究成果。长期以来,高校出版社一直被认为是学术专著的最后堡垒,商业前景不佳。到目前为止,还没有对国内大学出版社的学术专著制作情况进行系统的数据分析。本文利用韩国国立图书馆的在线目录系统,收集了1950年至2015年间各大学出版社的专著出版物的书目记录。在分析中总共使用了21,015条记录。我们将2001年至2015年出版的专著分为学术性专著和非学术性专著。20世纪90年代,高校出版社的出版数量出现了大幅增长,但在2005年达到顶峰后开始下降。大学出版社出版的非学术性专著比学术性专著多,比例为6:4。规模较大的大学出版社似乎比规模较小的出版社出版了更高比例的学术专著。从作者类型来看,单一作者所占比例最高,且呈上升趋势。然而,编辑书籍正在失去市场,而翻译书籍似乎保持稳定。社会科学专著的出版频率比任何其他学科领域都要高,因为就学术专著的比例而言,各学科领域之间似乎存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信