ANALYSIS OF THE PROCEDURAL STATUS OF A PERSON PROVIDING PAID WORK UNDER A CIVIL LAW CONTRACT IN EMPLOYMENT LAW CASES

Łukasz Łaguna
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF THE PROCEDURAL STATUS OF A PERSON PROVIDING PAID WORK UNDER A CIVIL LAW CONTRACT IN EMPLOYMENT LAW CASES","authors":"Łukasz Łaguna","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.8314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The amendment of the Trade Union Act by the Act of 5 July 2018 amending the Trade Union Act and certain other acts (Journal of Laws, item 1608), which entered into force on 1 January 2019, redefined the essence of collective labour law. Pursuant to the aforementioned amendment, the legislator introduced into the legal system the institution of a “ person who performs paid work”, which includes both an employee within the meaning of Article 2 of the Labour Code and a person providing work for remuneration on a basis other than employment relationship (so-called non-employee). The analysis of the introduced provisions leads to the conclusion that the legislator focused on providing non-employees with substantive legal rights, such as, among others, the right of union coalition. However, in my opinion, the legislator neglected analogous scrupulosity in the area of procedural rights of non-employees, which led to a situation in which non-employees are partially entitled to the same substantive rights as employees, but do not have analogous procedural rights. In my view, this constitutes a flagrant omission on the part of the legislator which, as a consequence, leads to legal uncertainty and a lack of effectiveness of the protection introduced for non-employees.","PeriodicalId":158454,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.8314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The amendment of the Trade Union Act by the Act of 5 July 2018 amending the Trade Union Act and certain other acts (Journal of Laws, item 1608), which entered into force on 1 January 2019, redefined the essence of collective labour law. Pursuant to the aforementioned amendment, the legislator introduced into the legal system the institution of a “ person who performs paid work”, which includes both an employee within the meaning of Article 2 of the Labour Code and a person providing work for remuneration on a basis other than employment relationship (so-called non-employee). The analysis of the introduced provisions leads to the conclusion that the legislator focused on providing non-employees with substantive legal rights, such as, among others, the right of union coalition. However, in my opinion, the legislator neglected analogous scrupulosity in the area of procedural rights of non-employees, which led to a situation in which non-employees are partially entitled to the same substantive rights as employees, but do not have analogous procedural rights. In my view, this constitutes a flagrant omission on the part of the legislator which, as a consequence, leads to legal uncertainty and a lack of effectiveness of the protection introduced for non-employees.
就业法案件中民法合同下提供有偿工作的人的程序地位分析
2019年1月1日生效的2018年7月5日修订《工会法》和某些其他法案(《法学期刊》第1608项)对《工会法》进行了修订,重新定义了集体劳动法的本质。根据上述修正案,立法者在法律制度中引入了“从事有偿工作的人”的制度,其中既包括《劳动法》第2条意义上的雇员,也包括在雇佣关系以外的基础上提供工作以获得报酬的人(所谓的非雇员)。对引入条款的分析得出结论,立法者侧重于为非雇员提供实质性的法律权利,例如工会联盟权等。然而,笔者认为,立法者在非雇员的程序性权利方面忽视了类似的审查,导致非雇员部分享有与雇员相同的实质性权利,但没有类似的程序性权利。在我看来,这构成了立法者的公然疏忽,其结果是导致法律上的不确定性和对非雇员的保护缺乏有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信