Management Theory. A Critical and Reflexive Reading

Viviane Morrigan
{"title":"Management Theory. A Critical and Reflexive Reading","authors":"Viviane Morrigan","doi":"10.5172/jmo.2005.11.1.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"NANETTE MONIN 2004 Management Theory. A Critical and Reflexive Reading In the Management, Organisations and Society Series Edited by Barbara Czarniawska & Martha Feldman Routledge London & New York One way to read Monin's text is as a 'methods' book, but one that is refreshingly out of the ordinary for the management discipline. In it the author describes the eclectic 'scriptive' method of text analysis that she developed for her PhD research project and is able to use in her current work in the Department of Management and Business at Massey University in New Zealand. Based on literary criticism, deconstruction, reader-response and rhetoric theories, the scriptive method involves a tripartite process of reading a text. Firstly, a 'dominant' reading focuses on the author, to provide a summary of (what the reader understands is) their argument(s). Monin chose this Derridean label in an effort to escape a realist mode of analysis-also calling it 'paraphrasis', defined as 'a rewording of the original text' (p.77). secondly, an in-depth 'critical' reading focuses on the text. The backbone of her method, this phase examines three more 'P's that are borrowed from rhetoric theory and practice-'performance', 'perspective' and 'persuasion'. Thirdly, a 'reflexive' reading focuses on the reader, exploring how they have constructed their individual interpretation. This final phase Monin calls 'perpension'-the fifth 1P'-which she defines as 'a process of apprehending, considering and evaluating and \"weighing up\" the outcomes of my reading to this point' (p. 80). Monin then applies her scriptive method to analyse selected parts of five classic management texts: Frederick Taylor's The Principles of Scientific Management, Mary Follett's Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett, Peter Drucker's The Practice of Management, Henry Mintzberg's The Nature of Managerial Work, and Rosabeth Moss Kanter's The Change Masters: Corporate Entrepreneurs at Work. Monin concludes that four of the texts contain a long-held and institutionalized Utopian metanarrative and root metaphor that provides ten 'precepts', or rules of moral conduct for guiding the practice of management and its theories over much of the 20th century. This is a heroic story of progress in the form of a journey that instructs managers to discard old incorrect theories and practices in favour of the map that is offered, which will ensure that the hero discovers the right question and its answer. When he (the hero is strongly gendered as male) reaches this Utopian future place, the manager will enjoy many powerful roles that will enable him to control his employees, with whom to fight others different from them, but who are, nevertheless, resources for meeting the primary financial needs of both himself and his organisation (pp. 189-191). Follett's is the exception-and noticeably so, as her text contradicts nine of the ten precepts (her only similarity is in her criticisms of the past and suggestions for management in the future) (p. 193). Monin proposes that her evidence of Follett's different perspective can explain the discipline's long neglect of her ideas, and that a recent disciplinary interest in Follett's texts promises new narratives and worldviews to guide future theory and practice of management (pp. 196-197). Taking up Monin's invitation to use her scriptive method, I follow up my 'dominant' reading outlined above with a 'critical' reading of her text that identifies a number of ways the author performs her text. Firstly, Monin adopts a role of poet and literary scholar, which she signals from the beginning, when she introduces a poem by Robert Graves and a Shakespearian quotation in blank verse before even exercising her own voice. In her arresting opening paragraph she then constructs herself as a hybrid poet/management theorist: I read poetry and I read management theory. Sometimes I read poetry in search of a good theory and sometimes I read management theory as if it were a poem (p. …","PeriodicalId":174777,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management","volume":"192 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2005.11.1.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

NANETTE MONIN 2004 Management Theory. A Critical and Reflexive Reading In the Management, Organisations and Society Series Edited by Barbara Czarniawska & Martha Feldman Routledge London & New York One way to read Monin's text is as a 'methods' book, but one that is refreshingly out of the ordinary for the management discipline. In it the author describes the eclectic 'scriptive' method of text analysis that she developed for her PhD research project and is able to use in her current work in the Department of Management and Business at Massey University in New Zealand. Based on literary criticism, deconstruction, reader-response and rhetoric theories, the scriptive method involves a tripartite process of reading a text. Firstly, a 'dominant' reading focuses on the author, to provide a summary of (what the reader understands is) their argument(s). Monin chose this Derridean label in an effort to escape a realist mode of analysis-also calling it 'paraphrasis', defined as 'a rewording of the original text' (p.77). secondly, an in-depth 'critical' reading focuses on the text. The backbone of her method, this phase examines three more 'P's that are borrowed from rhetoric theory and practice-'performance', 'perspective' and 'persuasion'. Thirdly, a 'reflexive' reading focuses on the reader, exploring how they have constructed their individual interpretation. This final phase Monin calls 'perpension'-the fifth 1P'-which she defines as 'a process of apprehending, considering and evaluating and "weighing up" the outcomes of my reading to this point' (p. 80). Monin then applies her scriptive method to analyse selected parts of five classic management texts: Frederick Taylor's The Principles of Scientific Management, Mary Follett's Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett, Peter Drucker's The Practice of Management, Henry Mintzberg's The Nature of Managerial Work, and Rosabeth Moss Kanter's The Change Masters: Corporate Entrepreneurs at Work. Monin concludes that four of the texts contain a long-held and institutionalized Utopian metanarrative and root metaphor that provides ten 'precepts', or rules of moral conduct for guiding the practice of management and its theories over much of the 20th century. This is a heroic story of progress in the form of a journey that instructs managers to discard old incorrect theories and practices in favour of the map that is offered, which will ensure that the hero discovers the right question and its answer. When he (the hero is strongly gendered as male) reaches this Utopian future place, the manager will enjoy many powerful roles that will enable him to control his employees, with whom to fight others different from them, but who are, nevertheless, resources for meeting the primary financial needs of both himself and his organisation (pp. 189-191). Follett's is the exception-and noticeably so, as her text contradicts nine of the ten precepts (her only similarity is in her criticisms of the past and suggestions for management in the future) (p. 193). Monin proposes that her evidence of Follett's different perspective can explain the discipline's long neglect of her ideas, and that a recent disciplinary interest in Follett's texts promises new narratives and worldviews to guide future theory and practice of management (pp. 196-197). Taking up Monin's invitation to use her scriptive method, I follow up my 'dominant' reading outlined above with a 'critical' reading of her text that identifies a number of ways the author performs her text. Firstly, Monin adopts a role of poet and literary scholar, which she signals from the beginning, when she introduces a poem by Robert Graves and a Shakespearian quotation in blank verse before even exercising her own voice. In her arresting opening paragraph she then constructs herself as a hybrid poet/management theorist: I read poetry and I read management theory. Sometimes I read poetry in search of a good theory and sometimes I read management theory as if it were a poem (p. …
管理理论。批判性和反思性阅读
《管理理论》,2004。《管理、组织和社会》系列中的批判性和反思性阅读芭芭拉·查尼亚夫斯卡和玛莎·费尔德曼·劳特利奇伦敦和纽约编辑。阅读莫宁的文本的一种方式是将其视为一本“方法”书,但它对管理学科来说是一本令人耳目一新的书。在这篇文章中,作者描述了她为博士研究项目开发的折衷的“脚本”文本分析方法,并能够在她目前在新西兰梅西大学管理与商业学系的工作中使用。基于文学批评、解构主义、读者反应和修辞学理论,剧本方法涉及到阅读文本的三个过程。首先,“主导”阅读将重点放在作者身上,对作者的论点(读者所理解的)进行总结。莫宁选择这个德里德里式的标签是为了逃避现实主义的分析模式——也称其为“释义”,定义为“对原文的重新措辞”(第77页)。其次,对文本进行深入的“批判性”阅读。作为她的方法的支柱,这一阶段检查了另外三个从修辞学理论和实践中借来的“P”——“表现”、“观点”和“说服”。第三,“反身性”阅读关注读者,探索他们如何构建自己的个人解读。莫宁把这个最后阶段称为“perpension”——第五个p——她将其定义为“理解、考虑、评估和“权衡”我阅读到这一点的结果的过程”(第80页)。莫宁随后运用她的文字方法分析了五本经典管理学著作的部分内容:弗雷德里克·泰勒的《科学管理原理》、玛丽·福莱特的《动态管理:玛丽·帕克·福莱特论文选集》、彼得·德鲁克的《管理实践》、亨利·明茨伯格的《管理工作的本质》和罗莎贝丝·莫斯·坎特的《变革大师:工作中的企业企业家》。莫宁的结论是,其中四个文本包含了一个长期持有的制度化的乌托邦元叙事和根源隐喻,它提供了十条“戒律”,或道德行为规则,用于指导20世纪大部分时间的管理实践及其理论。这是一个关于进步的英雄故事,以一种旅程的形式,指导管理者抛弃旧的不正确的理论和实践,支持提供的地图,这将确保英雄找到正确的问题和答案。当他(主人公强烈地性别化为男性)到达这个乌托邦式的未来时,经理将享受许多强大的角色,使他能够控制他的员工,与他们一起对抗与他们不同的人,但他们仍然是满足他自己和他的组织的主要财务需求的资源(第189-191页)。福莱特的书是个例外,而且明显如此,因为她的文章与十条戒律中的九条相矛盾(她唯一的相似之处在于她对过去的批评和对未来管理的建议)(第193页)。莫宁提出,她对福莱特不同观点的证据可以解释该学科长期以来对她的观点的忽视,最近对福莱特文本的学科兴趣有望为指导未来的管理理论和实践提供新的叙述和世界观(第196-197页)。接受莫宁的邀请,使用她的脚本方法,我在上面概述的“主导”阅读之后,对她的文本进行了“批判性”阅读,确定了作者执行文本的多种方式。首先,莫宁采用了诗人和文学学者的角色,她从一开始就表明了这一点,她甚至在行使自己的声音之前就以无韵诗介绍了罗伯特·格雷夫斯的一首诗和莎士比亚的语录。在引人注目的开篇段落中,她将自己塑造成一个诗人和管理理论家的混合体:我读诗,也读管理理论。有时我读诗是为了寻找一个好的理论,有时我把管理理论当作一首诗来读(p. ...)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信