The Power and Restraint of Waltzian Neorealism

Randall L. Schweller
{"title":"The Power and Restraint of Waltzian Neorealism","authors":"Randall L. Schweller","doi":"10.36859/jgss.v2i2.1165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kenneth Waltz constructed a pure theory of international politics by isolating structural from unit-level causes. Today’s return of great-power politics signals the persistent relevance of Waltz’s notion of patterns and regularities driven by structural-systemic forces. We have entered an unbalanced bipolar world, in which America still exceeds China in every important category of national power but the gap is narrowing. The relative-power trajectories of the two sides now frames the structural dynamics of their relationship, and how others perceive and calculate their strategic competition. No longer occupying a position of “primacy” either globally or in the Asian Pacific region, the United States now tends to exaggerate, not underestimate, the perceived threat from China in the economic and security realms. More broadly, the world is transitioning from hegemonic order to global disharmony and a restored balance of power—what I refer to as a “Dissent” phase of history. In this phase, disruption of global stability comes not only from the emergence of a counter-hegemonic alliance, which begins to voice its dissatisfaction with the status-quo order and underlying social purpose. It also comes from the hegemon itself, which behaves in ways that undermine its own order—an order that it now sees as not only unprofitable but a drain on its wasting assets through sponging allies and the exorbitant costs of delivering global public goods.","PeriodicalId":206360,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Global Strategic Studies","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Global Strategic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36859/jgss.v2i2.1165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kenneth Waltz constructed a pure theory of international politics by isolating structural from unit-level causes. Today’s return of great-power politics signals the persistent relevance of Waltz’s notion of patterns and regularities driven by structural-systemic forces. We have entered an unbalanced bipolar world, in which America still exceeds China in every important category of national power but the gap is narrowing. The relative-power trajectories of the two sides now frames the structural dynamics of their relationship, and how others perceive and calculate their strategic competition. No longer occupying a position of “primacy” either globally or in the Asian Pacific region, the United States now tends to exaggerate, not underestimate, the perceived threat from China in the economic and security realms. More broadly, the world is transitioning from hegemonic order to global disharmony and a restored balance of power—what I refer to as a “Dissent” phase of history. In this phase, disruption of global stability comes not only from the emergence of a counter-hegemonic alliance, which begins to voice its dissatisfaction with the status-quo order and underlying social purpose. It also comes from the hegemon itself, which behaves in ways that undermine its own order—an order that it now sees as not only unprofitable but a drain on its wasting assets through sponging allies and the exorbitant costs of delivering global public goods.
华尔兹式新现实主义的力量与约束
华尔兹将结构原因与单位原因分离开来,构建了纯粹的国际政治理论。今天大国政治的回归标志着华尔兹关于由结构-系统力量驱动的模式和规律的概念的持久相关性。我们已经进入了一个不平衡的两极世界,美国在每一个重要的国家实力类别中仍然超过中国,但差距正在缩小。两国的相对实力轨迹现在决定了两国关系的结构动态,以及其他国家如何看待和计算两国的战略竞争。无论是在全球还是在亚太地区,美国都不再占据“主导”地位,美国现在倾向于夸大,而不是低估中国在经济和安全领域的威胁。更广泛地说,世界正在从霸权秩序过渡到全球不和谐和恢复的权力平衡——我称之为历史的“异议”阶段。在这一阶段,对全球稳定的破坏不仅来自一个反霸权联盟的出现,它开始表达对现状秩序和潜在社会目的的不满。它也来自于霸权本身,它的行为方式破坏了自己的秩序——现在它认为这种秩序不仅无利可图,而且还在消耗其浪费的资产,因为它蚕食盟友,并为提供全球公共产品付出高昂的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信