A Ranking Framework for Higher Education Institutions in India: A Policy Analysis

Anil Kumar M, Manasa Nagabhushanam
{"title":"A Ranking Framework for Higher Education Institutions in India: A Policy Analysis","authors":"Anil Kumar M, Manasa Nagabhushanam","doi":"10.1109/MITE.2017.00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Indian higher education system in the post-independent times continued the colonial practice and so got isolated itself in the world higher education ranking system and not having indigenous ranking system meant we are practically working in the closed compartments. Except for a few research and management institutions, by and large the Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) did not appear in the global rankings, this non- appearance is a reflection of a policy neglect on higher education system in the country, leading to only a few institutions finding their places in the world rankings conducted by different bodies. The policy response to address this problem was that India having National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) to rank HEIs. The two year old NIRF has to be made robust enough for it to become relevance in improving the quality of education system. To this end research paper systematically engages in content and discourse analysis of NIRFs methodology, to identify its gaps and make a policy recommendation for developing it into a robust framework.","PeriodicalId":103416,"journal":{"name":"2017 5th IEEE International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 5th IEEE International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MITE.2017.00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Indian higher education system in the post-independent times continued the colonial practice and so got isolated itself in the world higher education ranking system and not having indigenous ranking system meant we are practically working in the closed compartments. Except for a few research and management institutions, by and large the Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) did not appear in the global rankings, this non- appearance is a reflection of a policy neglect on higher education system in the country, leading to only a few institutions finding their places in the world rankings conducted by different bodies. The policy response to address this problem was that India having National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) to rank HEIs. The two year old NIRF has to be made robust enough for it to become relevance in improving the quality of education system. To this end research paper systematically engages in content and discourse analysis of NIRFs methodology, to identify its gaps and make a policy recommendation for developing it into a robust framework.
印度高等教育机构排名框架:政策分析
独立后的印度高等教育系统延续了殖民时期的做法,因此在世界高等教育排名体系中被孤立,没有本土排名体系意味着我们实际上是在封闭的隔间里工作。除了少数研究和管理机构外,大多数高等教育机构(HEIs)没有出现在全球排名中,这种不出现反映了该国对高等教育系统的政策忽视,导致只有少数机构在不同机构进行的世界排名中找到了自己的位置。解决这一问题的政策反应是印度拥有国家院校排名框架(NIRF)来对高等教育机构进行排名。成立两年的NIRF必须变得足够强大,才能在提高教育体系质量方面发挥作用。为此,研究论文系统地分析了NIRFs方法论的内容和话语,以确定其差距,并提出政策建议,将其发展成为一个强大的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信