Axitinib in management of renal cell carcinoma: Indian perspective

S. Bhagat, Amit Y Jadhav, Saiprasad Patil, Hanmant Barkate
{"title":"Axitinib in management of renal cell carcinoma: Indian perspective","authors":"S. Bhagat, Amit Y Jadhav, Saiprasad Patil, Hanmant Barkate","doi":"10.4103/oji.oji_42_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer. Despite the availability of several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immunotherapies in India, the placing and sequencing of molecules in the management of RCC remains a source of dispute. The purpose of this qualitative survey was to get insight on the positioning of TKIs, specifically Axitinib, in the treatment of RCC. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey conducted across India among Medical Oncologist involved in the management of metastatic RCC. The questionnaire consists of 15 questions that were validated by a senior oncologist. The responses to the question were compiled in Microsoft Excel version 2018 and analyzed. Results: Total 51 oncologists completed this questionnaire. Majority preferred the International Metastatic RCC Database consortium risk stratification criteria. In favourable risk category sunitinib was preferred while in intermediate/poor risk patient's axitinib plus pembrolizumab was preferred by majority. Pazopanib and axitinib was favoured in patients with advanced age and comorbidities. Axitinib was the choice in patients who had good response to 1st line therapy and who have visceral metastasis. Majority of oncologists endorsed the use of axitinib in elderly with comorbid patients because of its favourable efficacy and tolerability. Conclusion: Axitinib is preferred choice in metastatic RCC patients who have responded well to TKIs in the first line, in elderly patients with associated comorbidities, in patients with renal impairment and in patients with poor performance status. It is a well-tolerated drug with minimal adverse effects which are transient in nature.","PeriodicalId":431823,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Journal of India","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Journal of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/oji.oji_42_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer. Despite the availability of several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immunotherapies in India, the placing and sequencing of molecules in the management of RCC remains a source of dispute. The purpose of this qualitative survey was to get insight on the positioning of TKIs, specifically Axitinib, in the treatment of RCC. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey conducted across India among Medical Oncologist involved in the management of metastatic RCC. The questionnaire consists of 15 questions that were validated by a senior oncologist. The responses to the question were compiled in Microsoft Excel version 2018 and analyzed. Results: Total 51 oncologists completed this questionnaire. Majority preferred the International Metastatic RCC Database consortium risk stratification criteria. In favourable risk category sunitinib was preferred while in intermediate/poor risk patient's axitinib plus pembrolizumab was preferred by majority. Pazopanib and axitinib was favoured in patients with advanced age and comorbidities. Axitinib was the choice in patients who had good response to 1st line therapy and who have visceral metastasis. Majority of oncologists endorsed the use of axitinib in elderly with comorbid patients because of its favourable efficacy and tolerability. Conclusion: Axitinib is preferred choice in metastatic RCC patients who have responded well to TKIs in the first line, in elderly patients with associated comorbidities, in patients with renal impairment and in patients with poor performance status. It is a well-tolerated drug with minimal adverse effects which are transient in nature.
阿西替尼在肾细胞癌的管理:印度的观点
背景:肾细胞癌(RCC)是最常见的肾癌类型。尽管在印度有几种酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)和免疫疗法,但在RCC治疗中的分子定位和测序仍然是争议的来源。本定性调查的目的是深入了解TKIs,特别是阿西替尼在RCC治疗中的定位。方法:这是一项横断面、基于问卷的调查,在印度各地参与转移性肾细胞癌管理的医学肿瘤学家中进行。问卷由15个问题组成,由一位资深肿瘤学家验证。在微软Excel 2018版中对问题的回答进行了整理和分析。结果:51名肿瘤学家完成了问卷调查。大多数人更喜欢国际转移性RCC数据库联盟风险分层标准。在有利风险类别中,首选舒尼替尼,而在中/低风险患者中,大多数首选阿西替尼加派姆单抗。帕唑帕尼和阿西替尼在老年和合并症患者中更受青睐。阿西替尼是对一线治疗反应良好和有内脏转移的患者的选择。由于其良好的疗效和耐受性,大多数肿瘤学家赞成在老年合并症患者中使用阿西替尼。结论:阿西替尼是一线对TKIs反应良好的转移性RCC患者、伴有相关合并症的老年患者、肾功能损害患者和表现不佳患者的首选。它是一种耐受性良好的药物,副作用很小,而且是短暂的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信