Analysis of Judgment Conditions in Making a Decision for Rehabilitation of Persons of Criminal Actions Based on Narcotics ABUSE Decision Number: 302/PID.SUS/2022/PN. TJK and Decision Number 217/PID.SUS/2022/PN.KLA

Asep Hidayatulloh, Guilin Xie, Deng Jiao, Yuanyuan Wang
{"title":"Analysis of Judgment Conditions in Making a Decision for Rehabilitation of Persons of Criminal Actions Based on Narcotics ABUSE Decision Number: 302/PID.SUS/2022/PN. TJK and Decision Number 217/PID.SUS/2022/PN.KLA","authors":"Asep Hidayatulloh, Guilin Xie, Deng Jiao, Yuanyuan Wang","doi":"10.55849/rjl.v1i1.314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Problems in handling cases of criminal acts of narcotics abuse, namely the emergence of criminal disparities in terms of sentencing, such as in cases of criminal acts of narcotics abuse in Decision Number: 302/Pid.Sus/2022/PN. Tjk and Decision Number 217/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Kla.\nPurpose. What are the factors that cause differences in judges' legal considerations in imposing decisions on rehabilitation of perpetrators of narcotics abuse based on Decision Number: 302/Pid.Sus/2022/PN. Tjk and Decision Number 217/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Kla. What are the legal considerations of judges in making decisions on rehabilitation of perpetrators of narcotics abuse based on Decision Number: 302/Pid.Sus/2022/PN. Tjk and Decision Number 217/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Kla.\nMethod. The research was carried out using a normative juridical approach and an empirical approach. The data used in this study were secondary data obtained from library materials, and field research was carried out by observation and interviews (interviews). The data obtained were analyzed qualitatively and juridically and deductively concluded.\nResults. the factors that cause differences in judges' considerations in imposing decisions are sourced from the legal system and sentencing philosophy, sourced from judges, and sourced from defendants. The occurrence of disparity is also due to the factor that the Panel of Supreme Court Justices has different legal considerations and the principle of judging themselves so that there is a different application of Articles from Court Decisions of first level and appellate level.: 302/Pid.Sus/2022/PN. Tjk and Decision Number 217/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Kla.\nConclusion. Suggestions in this study are that the Panel of Judges in cases of criminal acts of narcotics abuse should minimize criminal disparities to prevent the development of a negative perspective of society towards the criminal system in judicial institutions.","PeriodicalId":349644,"journal":{"name":"Rechtsnormen Journal of Law","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rechtsnormen Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55849/rjl.v1i1.314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background. Problems in handling cases of criminal acts of narcotics abuse, namely the emergence of criminal disparities in terms of sentencing, such as in cases of criminal acts of narcotics abuse in Decision Number: 302/Pid.Sus/2022/PN. Tjk and Decision Number 217/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Kla. Purpose. What are the factors that cause differences in judges' legal considerations in imposing decisions on rehabilitation of perpetrators of narcotics abuse based on Decision Number: 302/Pid.Sus/2022/PN. Tjk and Decision Number 217/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Kla. What are the legal considerations of judges in making decisions on rehabilitation of perpetrators of narcotics abuse based on Decision Number: 302/Pid.Sus/2022/PN. Tjk and Decision Number 217/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Kla. Method. The research was carried out using a normative juridical approach and an empirical approach. The data used in this study were secondary data obtained from library materials, and field research was carried out by observation and interviews (interviews). The data obtained were analyzed qualitatively and juridically and deductively concluded. Results. the factors that cause differences in judges' considerations in imposing decisions are sourced from the legal system and sentencing philosophy, sourced from judges, and sourced from defendants. The occurrence of disparity is also due to the factor that the Panel of Supreme Court Justices has different legal considerations and the principle of judging themselves so that there is a different application of Articles from Court Decisions of first level and appellate level.: 302/Pid.Sus/2022/PN. Tjk and Decision Number 217/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Kla. Conclusion. Suggestions in this study are that the Panel of Judges in cases of criminal acts of narcotics abuse should minimize criminal disparities to prevent the development of a negative perspective of society towards the criminal system in judicial institutions.
基于滥用毒品作出刑事行为人改造决定的判断条件分析决定号:302/PID.SUS/2022/PN。TJK和第217/PID.SUS/2022/PN.KLA号决定
背景。滥用毒品犯罪行为案件处理中出现的问题,即在量刑方面出现的刑事差异,如第302/ pid . su /2022/PN号决定对滥用毒品犯罪行为案件的处理。第217/Pid.Sus/2022/ pn . kla号决定根据第302/Pid.Sus/2022/PN号决定,法官在对滥用麻醉品的犯罪人作出改造决定时的法律考虑有哪些差异?Tjk和第217/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Kla号决定。根据第302/Pid.Sus/2022/PN号决定,法官在作出毒品滥用者改造的决定时应考虑哪些法律因素?Tjk和217号决议/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Kla.Method。本研究采用规范的法律方法和实证方法进行。本研究使用的数据是从图书馆资料中获得的二手数据,实地调查采用观察法和访谈法(访谈法)。对获得的数据进行定性分析,并进行司法和演绎总结。造成法官在执行判决时考虑差异的因素有法律制度和量刑理念,有法官的因素,也有被告的因素。这种差异的发生也是由于最高法院法官小组的法律考虑和审判原则不同,导致一级法院判决和上诉法院判决的条款适用不同。: 302 / Pid.Sus / 2022 / PN。Tjk和第217号决定/Pid.Sus/2022/ pn . kla .结论。本研究报告的建议是,审理滥用麻醉品犯罪行为案件的法官小组应尽量减少刑事差异,以防止社会对司法机构的刑事制度产生消极看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信