Buy now, pay later: The great unravelling of the commodity-form

IF 0.9
R. Albritton
{"title":"Buy now, pay later: The great unravelling of the commodity-form","authors":"R. Albritton","doi":"10.1080/2329194X.2019.1590722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, I analyze theoretically Marx’s commodity-form in connection with the latest phase of capitalism, which I refer to as the “phase of consumerism.” I will use an approximation to Kozo Uno’s and Tom Sekine’s three levels of analysis, but will oppose their three phases of capitalism (mercantilism, liberalism, and imperialism) with a fourth—the phase of consumerism—which developed primarily in the United States after World War II and reached its golden age between 1947 and 1970. Since the 1970s, capitalism has been moving gradually toward a phase of transition, during which it is becoming less and less capitalist. Coming to conclusions about just how capitalist the global economy still is must remain arguable. For example, should we label the existing economic order “neoliberalism,” “capitalism,” or something that it is moving toward, such as “populism” or “socialism”? Is it clear at this moment which concept best fits the directions of the global economy? It is a rapidly deteriorating capitalism with some fascist tendencies, tendencies that I will not discuss in this article but may be clear to those familiar with fascism.","PeriodicalId":174725,"journal":{"name":"The Japanese Political Economy","volume":"174 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Japanese Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2329194X.2019.1590722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In this article, I analyze theoretically Marx’s commodity-form in connection with the latest phase of capitalism, which I refer to as the “phase of consumerism.” I will use an approximation to Kozo Uno’s and Tom Sekine’s three levels of analysis, but will oppose their three phases of capitalism (mercantilism, liberalism, and imperialism) with a fourth—the phase of consumerism—which developed primarily in the United States after World War II and reached its golden age between 1947 and 1970. Since the 1970s, capitalism has been moving gradually toward a phase of transition, during which it is becoming less and less capitalist. Coming to conclusions about just how capitalist the global economy still is must remain arguable. For example, should we label the existing economic order “neoliberalism,” “capitalism,” or something that it is moving toward, such as “populism” or “socialism”? Is it clear at this moment which concept best fits the directions of the global economy? It is a rapidly deteriorating capitalism with some fascist tendencies, tendencies that I will not discuss in this article but may be clear to those familiar with fascism.
先买后付:商品形态的巨大解体
在这篇文章中,我从理论上分析马克思的商品形式与资本主义的最新阶段,我称之为“消费主义阶段”。我将使用近似于尾野耕三和汤姆·关根的三个层次的分析,但将反对他们的资本主义的三个阶段(重商主义、自由主义和帝国主义),并提出第四个阶段——消费主义阶段——这一阶段主要在第二次世界大战后的美国发展起来,并在1947年至1970年间达到了黄金时期。20世纪70年代以来,资本主义逐渐走向转型阶段,资本主义的资本主义倾向越来越少。关于全球经济到底有多资本主义的结论肯定仍有争议。例如,我们应该把现有的经济秩序称为“新自由主义”、“资本主义”,还是它正在走向的某种东西,如“民粹主义”或“社会主义”?目前,哪个概念最符合全球经济的发展方向,这一点清楚吗?这是一种迅速恶化的资本主义,带有一些法西斯倾向,我不会在这篇文章中讨论这些倾向,但对那些熟悉法西斯主义的人来说可能很清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书