SHARED DECISION MAKING FOR OTHER GENERAL CONDITIONS

J. Appleyard, J. Snaedal
{"title":"SHARED DECISION MAKING FOR OTHER GENERAL CONDITIONS","authors":"J. Appleyard, J. Snaedal","doi":"10.5750/ijpcm.v8i4.898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shared decision making based on clinical evidence and the patient’s informed preferences improves patient knowledge and ability to participate in their care with improvement to those with long-term health problems.A common ground between the patient and the physician is achieved through empathic communication skills with the provision of evidence-based information about options, outcomes, and uncertainties, together with decision support counseling and a systematic approach to recording and implementing patient’s preferences.It is important to recognize that the complexities of the clinical decision-making process with the confounding variables create difficulties in obtaining and measuring reproducible outcomes.","PeriodicalId":402902,"journal":{"name":"the International Journal of Person-Centered Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"the International Journal of Person-Centered Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/ijpcm.v8i4.898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Shared decision making based on clinical evidence and the patient’s informed preferences improves patient knowledge and ability to participate in their care with improvement to those with long-term health problems.A common ground between the patient and the physician is achieved through empathic communication skills with the provision of evidence-based information about options, outcomes, and uncertainties, together with decision support counseling and a systematic approach to recording and implementing patient’s preferences.It is important to recognize that the complexities of the clinical decision-making process with the confounding variables create difficulties in obtaining and measuring reproducible outcomes.
在其他一般情况下共同决策
基于临床证据和患者知情偏好的共同决策提高了患者的知识和参与护理的能力,改善了那些有长期健康问题的患者。患者和医生之间的共同点是通过移情沟通技巧,提供关于选择、结果和不确定性的循证信息,以及决策支持咨询和记录和实施患者偏好的系统方法来实现的。重要的是要认识到临床决策过程的复杂性与混杂变量造成的困难,以获得和测量可重复的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信