Grading Practices as Push and Pull Factors in Tertiary Learning in the Implementation of Outcomes-Based Education

Warren A. Ramos
{"title":"Grading Practices as Push and Pull Factors in Tertiary Learning in the Implementation of Outcomes-Based Education","authors":"Warren A. Ramos","doi":"10.7718/IAMURE.IJE.V13I1.967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grading practices have long been a controversial issue in the academe. There is an urgency to revisit the grading practices of college instructors in the changing landscape of educational policies. This study aimed to identify and differentiate the grading practices that promote and inhibit learning in the outcomes-based education (OBE) among college instructors in English 1 using descriptive survey method design, interview, and documentary analysis. The statistical methods used were weighted mean, one way ANOVA and t-test. The result of the study discussed that the majority of the respondents are in 31-36 years of age, female, married, having Masters Degree and with four to six years experience in teaching. The highest promoter of learning to grading practices as perceived by teachers was grading based on the stated learning outcomes. The identified inhibitor of learning practices was giving of deductions in the student’s grades based on behavior. Results also show that the grading practices of instructors have no significant difference when grouped according to their profile. The findings of the study were used as an input towards the formulation of proposed guidelines to improve the grading practices in the implementation of OBE. Keywords - Grading Practices, Descriptive –Survey, Outcomes-based Education, One-way ANOVA, t-test of independence, Intended learning outcomes, Philippines","PeriodicalId":416137,"journal":{"name":"IAMURE: International Journal of Education","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IAMURE: International Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7718/IAMURE.IJE.V13I1.967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Grading practices have long been a controversial issue in the academe. There is an urgency to revisit the grading practices of college instructors in the changing landscape of educational policies. This study aimed to identify and differentiate the grading practices that promote and inhibit learning in the outcomes-based education (OBE) among college instructors in English 1 using descriptive survey method design, interview, and documentary analysis. The statistical methods used were weighted mean, one way ANOVA and t-test. The result of the study discussed that the majority of the respondents are in 31-36 years of age, female, married, having Masters Degree and with four to six years experience in teaching. The highest promoter of learning to grading practices as perceived by teachers was grading based on the stated learning outcomes. The identified inhibitor of learning practices was giving of deductions in the student’s grades based on behavior. Results also show that the grading practices of instructors have no significant difference when grouped according to their profile. The findings of the study were used as an input towards the formulation of proposed guidelines to improve the grading practices in the implementation of OBE. Keywords - Grading Practices, Descriptive –Survey, Outcomes-based Education, One-way ANOVA, t-test of independence, Intended learning outcomes, Philippines
在实施成果为本的教育中,评分作为高等教育的推挽因素
长期以来,评分做法在学术界一直是一个有争议的问题。在不断变化的教育政策中,迫切需要重新审视大学教师的评分做法。本研究旨在通过描述性调查设计、访谈和文献分析,识别和区分大学英语1教师在结果导向型教育(OBE)中促进和抑制学习的评分做法。统计方法采用加权平均、单因素方差分析和t检验。研究结果表明,大多数受访者年龄在31-36岁之间,已婚,拥有硕士学位,具有4至6年的教学经验。教师认为,学习对评分实践的最高促进因素是基于陈述的学习成果进行评分。确定的学习实践的抑制因素是根据学生的行为来扣分。结果还表明,根据教师的个人资料分组时,教师的评分实践没有显著差异。这项研究的结果被用作制订建议准则的投入,以改善在执行外聘服务时的评等做法。关键词:评分实践,描述性调查,基于结果的教育,单因素方差分析,独立性t检验,预期学习成果,菲律宾
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信