Mars Colonization Plan: The Possibility And Scheme For Appropriation On Mars

Y. Putro
{"title":"Mars Colonization Plan: The Possibility And Scheme For Appropriation On Mars","authors":"Y. Putro","doi":"10.20885/PLR.VOL2.ISS2.ART2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This In the dawn of space era, State-driven and monopolized the space activities. This was exacerbated by high cost, military interference and the uncertain possibilities of civilian use. Nevertheless, as space technology grew, the enormous benefits created by space activities gradually motivated private companies to spend more capital and to use space for commercial purposes. Recently, two major of private space firms, SpaceX and Mars One reportedly has released their mission to Mars in order to conducted Mars Colonization Plan. On the other hand, the Outer Space Treaty and the rest of Corpus Juris Spatialis clearly prohibits to do appropriation on the Moon and the other Celestial Bodies, including Mars. It will be a new challenge for all legal actors, especially in the sense of the outer space regime, to explore this concept. This study applies normative legal research methodology. This study found: the current Outer Space Treaty particularly related to the non-appropriation principle is not relevant to the development of space technology and activities. Then, in this study the non-appropriation principle will be revisited based on the customary international law mechanism. Second, this study found the suitable scheme of appropriation during Mars Colonization Plan by establishing an Independent entity which authorize and organize the activities and also by implementing several stages in appropriating the Martian areas. Third, this study then proposed legal framework through amending and modernizing the Outer Space Treaty in order to compromise between the non-appropriation principle and the development of space commercialization.","PeriodicalId":330493,"journal":{"name":"Prophetic Law Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prophetic Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.VOL2.ISS2.ART2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This In the dawn of space era, State-driven and monopolized the space activities. This was exacerbated by high cost, military interference and the uncertain possibilities of civilian use. Nevertheless, as space technology grew, the enormous benefits created by space activities gradually motivated private companies to spend more capital and to use space for commercial purposes. Recently, two major of private space firms, SpaceX and Mars One reportedly has released their mission to Mars in order to conducted Mars Colonization Plan. On the other hand, the Outer Space Treaty and the rest of Corpus Juris Spatialis clearly prohibits to do appropriation on the Moon and the other Celestial Bodies, including Mars. It will be a new challenge for all legal actors, especially in the sense of the outer space regime, to explore this concept. This study applies normative legal research methodology. This study found: the current Outer Space Treaty particularly related to the non-appropriation principle is not relevant to the development of space technology and activities. Then, in this study the non-appropriation principle will be revisited based on the customary international law mechanism. Second, this study found the suitable scheme of appropriation during Mars Colonization Plan by establishing an Independent entity which authorize and organize the activities and also by implementing several stages in appropriating the Martian areas. Third, this study then proposed legal framework through amending and modernizing the Outer Space Treaty in order to compromise between the non-appropriation principle and the development of space commercialization.
火星殖民计划:在火星上占有的可能性和方案
在太空时代的黎明,国家主导和垄断了太空活动。高昂的成本、军事干预和民用可能性的不确定加剧了这种情况。然而,随着空间技术的发展,空间活动所产生的巨大利益逐渐促使私营公司花费更多的资本并将空间用于商业目的。最近,据报道,两家主要的私人太空公司SpaceX和火星一号已经发布了他们的火星任务,以实施火星殖民计划。另一方面,《外层空间条约》和其他《空间法大全》明确禁止对月球和包括火星在内的其他天体进行侵占。探索这一概念将是所有法律行为者,特别是外层空间制度意义上的法律行为者面临的一项新挑战。本研究采用规范的法律研究方法。这项研究发现:目前的《外层空间条约》特别涉及不占有原则,但与空间技术和活动的发展无关。然后,在本研究中,将根据习惯国际法机制重新审视不占有原则。其次,本研究通过建立一个独立的实体来授权和组织活动,并在火星地区的拨款中实施几个阶段,找到了火星殖民计划期间合适的拨款方案。第三,通过对《外层空间条约》的修改和现代化,提出法律框架,以实现不占有原则与空间商业化发展之间的折衷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信