Availability of contraceptive choice

N. Panay, C. Bellone
{"title":"Availability of contraceptive choice","authors":"N. Panay, C. Bellone","doi":"10.1002/TRE.154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When considering contraceptive choice for women in the UK, a Pandora’s box of social, political and ethical dilemmas is opened. Contraceptive choices should be motivated by a woman’s right to control her fertility. However, increasingly, we are presented with headlines suggesting that the UK is failing in this challenge on a daily basis. Sexual behaviours in all ages of the population have seen a shift towards more liberal practice from the 1980s at the height of public awareness of HIV. There has been an increase in sexually transmitted infections, particularly chlamydia, and rising abortion rates. 1 This is particularly true in the under-18 and over40 age groups, with teenage pregnancy rates now among the highest in Europe. To combat this public health problem, publications including ‘Next Steps’ guidance from the Department of Health and Department for Children, Schools and Families actively promote ‘equitable access to the full range of contraception methods and provision of high quality advice and support’. A key to the success in improving contraceptive choices is through understanding our local and often diverse populations. Although teenagers typically obtain their information from their peers, or more successfully from television campaigns, they are the highest users of local family planning or sexual health clinics. The percentage of women over 40 attending family planning or sexual health clinics is low, suggesting they are either not seeking advice or attending their local GP. Cultural diversity and religious beliefs also contribute signifi cantly to freedom of access and choices. 2","PeriodicalId":178319,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Urology, Gynaecology & Sexual Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Urology, Gynaecology & Sexual Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/TRE.154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When considering contraceptive choice for women in the UK, a Pandora’s box of social, political and ethical dilemmas is opened. Contraceptive choices should be motivated by a woman’s right to control her fertility. However, increasingly, we are presented with headlines suggesting that the UK is failing in this challenge on a daily basis. Sexual behaviours in all ages of the population have seen a shift towards more liberal practice from the 1980s at the height of public awareness of HIV. There has been an increase in sexually transmitted infections, particularly chlamydia, and rising abortion rates. 1 This is particularly true in the under-18 and over40 age groups, with teenage pregnancy rates now among the highest in Europe. To combat this public health problem, publications including ‘Next Steps’ guidance from the Department of Health and Department for Children, Schools and Families actively promote ‘equitable access to the full range of contraception methods and provision of high quality advice and support’. A key to the success in improving contraceptive choices is through understanding our local and often diverse populations. Although teenagers typically obtain their information from their peers, or more successfully from television campaigns, they are the highest users of local family planning or sexual health clinics. The percentage of women over 40 attending family planning or sexual health clinics is low, suggesting they are either not seeking advice or attending their local GP. Cultural diversity and religious beliefs also contribute signifi cantly to freedom of access and choices. 2
避孕选择的可得性
当考虑到英国女性的避孕选择时,社会、政治和道德困境的潘多拉盒子就被打开了。避孕选择应以妇女控制生育的权利为动机。然而,我们每天都看到越来越多的新闻标题表明,英国在这一挑战中失败了。自20世纪80年代公众对艾滋病毒的认识达到顶峰以来,各年龄段人群的性行为都朝着更自由的方向转变。性传播感染(尤其是衣原体感染)有所增加,堕胎率也在上升。这在18岁以下和40岁以上的年龄组中尤其如此,现在的青少年怀孕率是欧洲最高的。为了解决这一公共卫生问题,包括卫生部和儿童、学校和家庭部指导的“下一步”在内的出版物积极促进“公平获得各种避孕方法并提供高质量的咨询和支持”。在改善避孕选择方面取得成功的一个关键是了解我们当地的、往往是多样化的人口。虽然青少年通常从同龄人那里获得信息,或者更成功地从电视宣传中获得信息,但他们是当地计划生育或性健康诊所的最高使用者。40岁以上的妇女到计划生育或性健康诊所就诊的比例很低,这表明她们要么不寻求建议,要么去看当地的全科医生。文化多样性和宗教信仰也对获得和选择的自由作出重大贡献。2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信