Inferred Study Habits of Students from E-Learning – Focusing on Increasing Test Scores in Pre-Enrollment Education

Ryo Sugawara, S. Okuhara
{"title":"Inferred Study Habits of Students from E-Learning – Focusing on Increasing Test Scores in Pre-Enrollment Education","authors":"Ryo Sugawara, S. Okuhara","doi":"10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.3.659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we used the placement test scores, e-learning history, and posttest scores obtained in the pre-enrollment education at University A conducted in 2015, 2016, and 2017 to exploratorily classify seven types of students according to learning habits (types). It was revealed that more than 80% (with the exception of English in 2016) of the highest placement test scores (Japanese ≥ 90, English ≥ 74 in this study) were of learners with learning habits (types) of long-term completion (LTrf) or mid-term completion (MTrf). Although the percentage of learners with LTrf or MTrf learning habits (types) gradually decreased as placement test scores declined, there was no significant change in learning habit trends and learning habits (types) other than for LTrf or MTrf. In addition, learners with large increases in posttest scores (posttest score - placement score) after completing e-learning were classified with learning habits (types) of LTrf or MTrf. However, it is not only the learners who improved their test scores that were progressing without bias during the learning period (LTrf or MTrf). It was also found that more than 65% progressed in their learning (logged in) without being biased during the learning period. These findings suggest that there is no significant difference between learners' learning habits (types), placement test scores, and test score growth.","PeriodicalId":162221,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education and Pedagogy","volume":"332 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education and Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.3.659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we used the placement test scores, e-learning history, and posttest scores obtained in the pre-enrollment education at University A conducted in 2015, 2016, and 2017 to exploratorily classify seven types of students according to learning habits (types). It was revealed that more than 80% (with the exception of English in 2016) of the highest placement test scores (Japanese ≥ 90, English ≥ 74 in this study) were of learners with learning habits (types) of long-term completion (LTrf) or mid-term completion (MTrf). Although the percentage of learners with LTrf or MTrf learning habits (types) gradually decreased as placement test scores declined, there was no significant change in learning habit trends and learning habits (types) other than for LTrf or MTrf. In addition, learners with large increases in posttest scores (posttest score - placement score) after completing e-learning were classified with learning habits (types) of LTrf or MTrf. However, it is not only the learners who improved their test scores that were progressing without bias during the learning period (LTrf or MTrf). It was also found that more than 65% progressed in their learning (logged in) without being biased during the learning period. These findings suggest that there is no significant difference between learners' learning habits (types), placement test scores, and test score growth.
从网络学习中推断学生的学习习惯——着眼于提高入学前教育的考试成绩
在本研究中,我们利用A大学在2015年、2016年和2017年的预招生教育中获得的分班考试成绩、e-learning历史和后测成绩,根据学习习惯(类型)对学生进行了探索性的分类。结果显示,在分班考试成绩最高的学生(本研究中日语≥90分,英语≥74分)中,超过80%(2016年英语除外)是具有长期完成(LTrf)或中期完成(MTrf)学习习惯(类型)的学习者。尽管随着分班考试成绩的下降,LTrf和MTrf学习习惯(类型)的学习者比例逐渐下降,但除LTrf和MTrf外,其他学习习惯趋势和学习习惯(类型)没有显著变化。此外,在完成e-learning后,后测分数(后测分数-安置分数)有较大提高的学习者被分类为LTrf或MTrf的学习习惯(类型)。然而,在学习期间(LTrf或MTrf),并不是只有提高了考试成绩的学习者才没有偏见地进步。研究还发现,在学习期间,超过65%的人在学习(登录)中取得了进步,没有偏见。这些发现表明,学习者的学习习惯(类型)、分班考试成绩和考试成绩增长之间没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信