{"title":"Klinischer Vergleich eines neu entwickelten Prototyps zur Messung der Hornhautsensibilität zum aktuellen Goldstandard","authors":"Tobias Bracher, Daniela Nosch, Roland Joos","doi":"10.54352/dozv.hzdz5065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The aim of the study was to test a newly developed prototype for corneal sensitivity measurement (liquid jet (LJ) with saline as stimulus) for repeatability and correlation with the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (CB). This is an excerpt of a master thesis, which was part of a larger study Material and Methods. Corneal sensitivity thresholds (CST) were determined for 30 subjects, in a clinical trial with 30 subjects, with each device on two separate dates (with inter- vals of at least one day and a maximum of fourteen days). In addition, the pain sensitivity questionnaire (PSQ) was applied to determine any possible correlation with corneal sensitivity. Results. Similar standard deviations of the CSTs for LJ and CB were obtained (LJ (M ± SD): 24.3 ± 2.0 dB; CB (M ± SD): 20.0 ± 2.0 dB). No statistically significant difference in CST was found between the two visits for LJ (mean differen- ce: -0.063 dB, p = 0.78), however there was a statistically significant difference for CB (mean difference: -0.641 dB, p = 0.003). LJ CSTs correlated moderately positively with CB CSTs and PSQ (LJ-CB: r = 0.476, p < 0.001; LJ-PSQ: r = 0.437, p < 0.001). Conclusion. LJ offers a significantly larger stimulus bandwidth than CB. Better reproducibility was observed for LJ, while correlation between the results for the two instruments was good. Significant moderate positive correlation was found between LJ CSTs and general pain sensitivity. Keywords esthesiometry, Cochet-Bonnet, Liquid Jet, prototype, PSQ","PeriodicalId":347784,"journal":{"name":"Optometry & Contact Lenses","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry & Contact Lenses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54352/dozv.hzdz5065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose. The aim of the study was to test a newly developed prototype for corneal sensitivity measurement (liquid jet (LJ) with saline as stimulus) for repeatability and correlation with the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (CB). This is an excerpt of a master thesis, which was part of a larger study Material and Methods. Corneal sensitivity thresholds (CST) were determined for 30 subjects, in a clinical trial with 30 subjects, with each device on two separate dates (with inter- vals of at least one day and a maximum of fourteen days). In addition, the pain sensitivity questionnaire (PSQ) was applied to determine any possible correlation with corneal sensitivity. Results. Similar standard deviations of the CSTs for LJ and CB were obtained (LJ (M ± SD): 24.3 ± 2.0 dB; CB (M ± SD): 20.0 ± 2.0 dB). No statistically significant difference in CST was found between the two visits for LJ (mean differen- ce: -0.063 dB, p = 0.78), however there was a statistically significant difference for CB (mean difference: -0.641 dB, p = 0.003). LJ CSTs correlated moderately positively with CB CSTs and PSQ (LJ-CB: r = 0.476, p < 0.001; LJ-PSQ: r = 0.437, p < 0.001). Conclusion. LJ offers a significantly larger stimulus bandwidth than CB. Better reproducibility was observed for LJ, while correlation between the results for the two instruments was good. Significant moderate positive correlation was found between LJ CSTs and general pain sensitivity. Keywords esthesiometry, Cochet-Bonnet, Liquid Jet, prototype, PSQ
目的。本研究的目的是测试一种新开发的角膜灵敏度测量原型(以生理盐水作为刺激的液体喷射(LJ))的重复性和与Cochet-Bonnet感觉计(CB)的相关性。这是一篇硕士论文的节选,是一项更大的研究材料与方法的一部分。在一项有30名受试者的临床试验中,确定了30名受试者的角膜敏感阈值(CST),每个设备在两个不同的日期(间隔至少一天,最多14天)。此外,采用疼痛敏感性问卷(PSQ)来确定是否与角膜敏感性相关。结果。LJ和CB的CSTs标准差相近(LJ (M±SD): 24.3±2.0 dB;CB (M±SD): 20.0±2.0 dB)。两组间LJ的CST差异无统计学意义(平均差异:-0.063 dB, p = 0.78),而CB的CST差异有统计学意义(平均差异:-0.641 dB, p = 0.003)。LJ CSTs与CB CSTs、PSQ呈正相关(LJ-CB: r = 0.476, p < 0.001;LJ-PSQ: r = 0.437, p < 0.001)。结论。LJ的刺激带宽明显大于CB。LJ的重现性较好,两种仪器结果的相关性较好。LJ CSTs与一般疼痛敏感性之间存在显著的中度正相关。关键词:感官测量学,考奇-帽,液体喷射,原型,PSQ