List of Most Usability Evaluation in Mobile Application: A Systematic Literature Review

Sunardi, G. F. P. Desak, Gintoro
{"title":"List of Most Usability Evaluation in Mobile Application: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Sunardi, G. F. P. Desak, Gintoro","doi":"10.1109/ICIMTech50083.2020.9211160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile application is one of the most growth technology that can help people do better. Mobile applications nowadays have created tremendously compared with the website. Usability issues will be questioning as a measurement of mobile application accepted in the market. This paper reports on the systematic literature review (SLR) from 2010 up to 2020 to investigate how usability evaluation of mobile applications will change along the time through the evaluation of mobile devices. From 168 paper retrieved, 32 papers are selected to find the relevance of the research question. The result shows several famous indicators of usability evaluation, which are effectiveness, efficiency, and user satisfaction. There are new inclusions that come as new indicators such as error, learnability, memorability, simplicity, and cognitive load. This result indicates the need for future research especially for new rapid applications created","PeriodicalId":407765,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech)","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech50083.2020.9211160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Mobile application is one of the most growth technology that can help people do better. Mobile applications nowadays have created tremendously compared with the website. Usability issues will be questioning as a measurement of mobile application accepted in the market. This paper reports on the systematic literature review (SLR) from 2010 up to 2020 to investigate how usability evaluation of mobile applications will change along the time through the evaluation of mobile devices. From 168 paper retrieved, 32 papers are selected to find the relevance of the research question. The result shows several famous indicators of usability evaluation, which are effectiveness, efficiency, and user satisfaction. There are new inclusions that come as new indicators such as error, learnability, memorability, simplicity, and cognitive load. This result indicates the need for future research especially for new rapid applications created
移动应用的可用性评估:系统的文献综述
移动应用程序是最具发展潜力的技术之一,它可以帮助人们做得更好。与网站相比,如今的移动应用程序已经创造了巨大的进步。可用性问题将成为衡量手机应用是否被市场接受的标准。本文通过2010年至2020年的系统文献综述(SLR),通过对移动设备的评估来研究移动应用的可用性评估如何随着时间的推移而变化。从检索到的168篇论文中,选择32篇论文来寻找研究问题的相关性。结果显示了可用性评估的几个著名指标,即有效性、效率和用户满意度。还有新的包含项作为新的指标出现,如错误、可学习性、可记忆性、简单性和认知负荷。这一结果表明了未来研究的需要,特别是对于新的快速应用的创建
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信