On the Insufficiencies of the Current Legislative Regime Regarding Physician-Patient Mediation in the Professional Liability of Physicians. A Critical Analysis of the Polish Solution

Dominika Bek, J. Hanc
{"title":"On the Insufficiencies of the Current Legislative Regime Regarding Physician-Patient Mediation in the Professional Liability of Physicians. A Critical Analysis of the Polish Solution","authors":"Dominika Bek, J. Hanc","doi":"10.18690/mls.16.1.25-54.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \nThe article presents a critical opinion on physician- patient mediation conducted in the context of proceedings on the professional liability of physicians. The starting point is the Act on Medical Chambers, which provides for the possibility of conducting a mediation between the accused physician and the aggrieved patient. This regulation is unique in the region. Its specific measures, such as, for example, the choice of a mediator among physicians, have undergone a critical assessment in the literature. As a rule, the need for the functioning of mediation in the context of professional liability is not called into question. However, a thorough analysis of the assumptions of mediation and restorative justice and the function of professional liability of physicians suggests going a step further. Although the physician-patient conflict certainly requires conciliatory solutions, it seems that the disciplinary regime does not provide an adequate foundation for agreement because it is unable to secure the aggrieved person’s interests. \n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":227174,"journal":{"name":"Medicine, Law & Society","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine, Law & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/mls.16.1.25-54.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents a critical opinion on physician- patient mediation conducted in the context of proceedings on the professional liability of physicians. The starting point is the Act on Medical Chambers, which provides for the possibility of conducting a mediation between the accused physician and the aggrieved patient. This regulation is unique in the region. Its specific measures, such as, for example, the choice of a mediator among physicians, have undergone a critical assessment in the literature. As a rule, the need for the functioning of mediation in the context of professional liability is not called into question. However, a thorough analysis of the assumptions of mediation and restorative justice and the function of professional liability of physicians suggests going a step further. Although the physician-patient conflict certainly requires conciliatory solutions, it seems that the disciplinary regime does not provide an adequate foundation for agreement because it is unable to secure the aggrieved person’s interests.
论现行医生职业责任中医患调解立法制度的不足。对波兰方案的批判性分析
本文对在医生职业责任诉讼中进行的医患调解提出了批评意见。出发点是《医疗分庭法》,该法规定了在被告医生和受害病人之间进行调解的可能性。这一规定在该地区是独一无二的。它的具体措施,例如,在医生中选择一个调解人,已经在文献中进行了重要的评估。作为一项规则,调解在专业责任方面发挥作用的必要性是毋庸置疑的。然而,深入分析调解和恢复性司法的假设以及医生职业责任的功能,建议我们走得更远。虽然医患冲突当然需要和解的解决方案,但纪律制度似乎并没有为协议提供充分的基础,因为它无法确保受害方的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信