Reliability and Safety Assessment of Automated Driving Systems: Review and Preview

2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) Pub Date : 2020-12-14 DOI:10.1109/IEEM45057.2020.9309972

Kuo-Wei Wu, Chung-Chih Liao, Wen-Fang Wu

{"title":"Reliability and Safety Assessment of Automated Driving Systems: Review and Preview","authors":"Kuo-Wei Wu, Chung-Chih Liao, Wen-Fang Wu","doi":"10.1109/IEEM45057.2020.9309972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2018, SAE International released a revised version of ADS (Automated Driving System) classification standard—SAE J3016 and divided it into six different classification levels. Many people doubt about the reliability of AV (Autonomous Vehicles with ADS), ADS, and HAD (Highly Automated Driving). They may wonder if and when the public is ready to enter different SAE levels. To illustrate and resolve some of their questions, this paper divides \"ADS reliability and safety\" into the following four segments: (1) AV hardware reliability, (2) HAD reliability, (3) Integration reliability by road tests, and (4) resilience & CPS (CyberPhysical System) reliability. The paper tries to answer the following RQs. RQ1: Are the reliability and safety of vehicle hardware sufficient for the current SAE level 0-2 vehicles? RQ2: Are HAD’s decisions reliable in all current workable scenarios? RQ3: Is the failure rate of ADS significantly better than that of human-driven vehicles in public testing? RQ4: Do human drivers have to intervene or participate in while driving AVs?","PeriodicalId":226426,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM45057.2020.9309972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 2018, SAE International released a revised version of ADS (Automated Driving System) classification standard—SAE J3016 and divided it into six different classification levels. Many people doubt about the reliability of AV (Autonomous Vehicles with ADS), ADS, and HAD (Highly Automated Driving). They may wonder if and when the public is ready to enter different SAE levels. To illustrate and resolve some of their questions, this paper divides "ADS reliability and safety" into the following four segments: (1) AV hardware reliability, (2) HAD reliability, (3) Integration reliability by road tests, and (4) resilience & CPS (CyberPhysical System) reliability. The paper tries to answer the following RQs. RQ1: Are the reliability and safety of vehicle hardware sufficient for the current SAE level 0-2 vehicles? RQ2: Are HAD’s decisions reliable in all current workable scenarios? RQ3: Is the failure rate of ADS significantly better than that of human-driven vehicles in public testing? RQ4: Do human drivers have to intervene or participate in while driving AVs?

查看原文本刊更多论文

自动驾驶系统的可靠性和安全性评估:回顾和预览

2018年，SAE国际发布了修订版的ADS(自动驾驶系统)分类标准SAE J3016，并将其划分为6个不同的分类级别。许多人对AV(带有ADS的自动驾驶汽车)、ADS和HAD(高度自动驾驶)的可靠性表示怀疑。他们可能想知道，公众是否以及何时准备好进入不同的SAE级别。为了说明和解决其中的一些问题，本文将“ADS可靠性和安全性”分为以下四个部分:(1)AV硬件可靠性，(2)HAD可靠性，(3)道路测试集成可靠性，(4)弹性和CPS (CyberPhysical System)可靠性。本文试图回答以下问题。RQ1:车辆硬件的可靠性和安全性是否足以满足当前SAE 0-2级车辆的要求?在当前所有可行的场景中，HAD的决策是否可靠?RQ3:在公开测试中，ADS的故障率是否明显优于人类驾驶车辆?RQ4:在驾驶自动驾驶汽车时，人类驾驶员是否需要干预或参与?

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)

自引率

0.00%

发文量