Trends in compensation for human-wildlife conflict losses in Kenya

Joseph M. Mukeka, J. Ogutu, E. Kanga, E. Røskaft
{"title":"Trends in compensation for human-wildlife conflict losses in Kenya","authors":"Joseph M. Mukeka, J. Ogutu, E. Kanga, E. Røskaft","doi":"10.5897/IJBC2019.1278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human-wildlife conflicts (HWC) can cause substantial losses. Compensation for such losses is essential to foster positive community attitudes toward wildlife conservation. Monetary compensation for the loss of human life, injury, crop and property damage, or livestock depredation by wildlife is a common strategy for mitigating HWC. We analyzed inter-specific, spatial, inter-annual and seasonal variation in human-wildlife conflicts, conflict outcome and the associated monetary costs of compensation in Kenya during 2007-2016. A total of 18,794 compensation claims were filed with the Kenya National Compensation Scheme (KNCS) during 2007 - 2016. Snakes made the greatest contribution to the total cases (44.8%,  = 8,423), human fatalities (43.1%,  = 614) and human injuries (76.9%,  = 7,772). Elephant was the second leading conflict species (22.3%,  = 4,181) and was responsible for 18.8% ( = 266) of human deaths and over 75% of crop and property damage. Spotted hyena, leopard and lion caused 85% of livestock predation cases. The intensity and outcome of conflicts varied across counties such that most human fatalities occurred in arid Tana River and Wajir counties, whereas most human injuries occurred in Kitui and Wajir counties. The intensity of conflicts was strongly influenced by the agro-climatic potential and percentage of a county under protection, rainfall and temperature and their interactions. In consequence, crop damage was highest in counties with high agricultural potential (Meru and Taita Taveta) but livestock predation was highest in counties with large protected areas (Samburu and Taita Taveta). Human fatality and injury were higher among males than females and adults than children. Over the 10-year period, the Kenya Government spent about 3 billion Kenya shillings on compensation of about 30% of all filed claims. Compensation schemes require sustainable funding mechanisms and effective administration to minimize negative unintended consequences. \n \n   \n \n Key words: Human-wildlife conflicts, compensation, snake bites, attack on humans, livestock predation, crop raiding, rainfall, temperature, human population growth.","PeriodicalId":143839,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation","volume":"750 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/IJBC2019.1278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Human-wildlife conflicts (HWC) can cause substantial losses. Compensation for such losses is essential to foster positive community attitudes toward wildlife conservation. Monetary compensation for the loss of human life, injury, crop and property damage, or livestock depredation by wildlife is a common strategy for mitigating HWC. We analyzed inter-specific, spatial, inter-annual and seasonal variation in human-wildlife conflicts, conflict outcome and the associated monetary costs of compensation in Kenya during 2007-2016. A total of 18,794 compensation claims were filed with the Kenya National Compensation Scheme (KNCS) during 2007 - 2016. Snakes made the greatest contribution to the total cases (44.8%,  = 8,423), human fatalities (43.1%,  = 614) and human injuries (76.9%,  = 7,772). Elephant was the second leading conflict species (22.3%,  = 4,181) and was responsible for 18.8% ( = 266) of human deaths and over 75% of crop and property damage. Spotted hyena, leopard and lion caused 85% of livestock predation cases. The intensity and outcome of conflicts varied across counties such that most human fatalities occurred in arid Tana River and Wajir counties, whereas most human injuries occurred in Kitui and Wajir counties. The intensity of conflicts was strongly influenced by the agro-climatic potential and percentage of a county under protection, rainfall and temperature and their interactions. In consequence, crop damage was highest in counties with high agricultural potential (Meru and Taita Taveta) but livestock predation was highest in counties with large protected areas (Samburu and Taita Taveta). Human fatality and injury were higher among males than females and adults than children. Over the 10-year period, the Kenya Government spent about 3 billion Kenya shillings on compensation of about 30% of all filed claims. Compensation schemes require sustainable funding mechanisms and effective administration to minimize negative unintended consequences.   Key words: Human-wildlife conflicts, compensation, snake bites, attack on humans, livestock predation, crop raiding, rainfall, temperature, human population growth.
肯尼亚人类与野生动物冲突损失补偿的趋势
人类与野生动物的冲突(HWC)会造成巨大的损失。对这些损失进行补偿对于培养社区对野生动物保护的积极态度至关重要。对人的生命损失、伤害、作物和财产损失或野生动物对牲畜的掠夺进行金钱赔偿是减轻HWC的常用策略。我们分析了2007-2016年肯尼亚人类与野生动物冲突、冲突结果和相关货币补偿成本的种间、空间、年际和季节变化。2007年至2016年期间,共向肯尼亚国家赔偿计划(KNCS)提交了18,794项赔偿要求。蛇占总病例的44.8%(= 8423),人类死亡(43.1%,= 614)和伤害(76.9%,= 7772)。大象是第二大冲突物种(22.3%,= 4181),造成18.8%(= 266)的人类死亡和75%以上的作物和财产损失。85%的牲畜被斑鬣狗、豹子和狮子捕食。各县冲突的强度和结果各不相同,大多数人员死亡发生在干旱的塔纳河县和瓦吉尔县,而大多数人员受伤发生在基图伊县和瓦吉尔县。冲突的强度受到农业气候潜力和受保护县的百分比、降雨和温度及其相互作用的强烈影响。因此,农业潜力高的县(梅鲁县和塔塔塔韦塔县)的作物损失最高,而保护区大的县(桑布鲁县和塔塔塔韦塔县)的牲畜捕食率最高。男性死亡率和伤害率高于女性,成年人高于儿童。在这10年期间,肯尼亚政府花费了约30亿肯尼亚先令,用于赔偿约占所有索赔的30%。补偿计划需要可持续的筹资机制和有效的管理,以尽量减少消极的意外后果。关键词:人兽冲突,补偿,蛇咬伤,人袭,牲畜捕食,农作物袭击,降雨,温度,人口增长
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信