From Tenure to Rights: Conceptualizing the Changing Focus of Housing Law in England

S. Blandy, Barry Goodchild
{"title":"From Tenure to Rights: Conceptualizing the Changing Focus of Housing Law in England","authors":"S. Blandy, Barry Goodchild","doi":"10.1080/14036099950150071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper suggests a new way of conceptualizing tenure as a series of discourses that comprise respectively: (a) property law; (b) housing policy; and (c) housing status. Housing research has generally focused on housing policy discourse in a way that obscures legal relationships. In contrast, a focus on property and housing status has greater potential to make explicit the rights and obligations that arise in different situations. The ?bundle of rights? view provides the most acceptable statement of tenure relations in housing. It is the only view that covers both property and housing status and that can also make sense of tendencies towards juridification. The implication for research is to focus on the exact terms of rights, their changing distribution between different parties and their scope for enforcement. If research extends to a review of the origins and continuing rationale of rights, some form of narrative analysis is usually necessary.","PeriodicalId":208179,"journal":{"name":"Housing Theory and Society","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Theory and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036099950150071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

This paper suggests a new way of conceptualizing tenure as a series of discourses that comprise respectively: (a) property law; (b) housing policy; and (c) housing status. Housing research has generally focused on housing policy discourse in a way that obscures legal relationships. In contrast, a focus on property and housing status has greater potential to make explicit the rights and obligations that arise in different situations. The ?bundle of rights? view provides the most acceptable statement of tenure relations in housing. It is the only view that covers both property and housing status and that can also make sense of tendencies towards juridification. The implication for research is to focus on the exact terms of rights, their changing distribution between different parties and their scope for enforcement. If research extends to a review of the origins and continuing rationale of rights, some form of narrative analysis is usually necessary.
从权属到权利:英国住房法重心的变迁
本文提出了一种将权属概念化为一系列话语的新方法,这些话语分别包括:(a)物权法;(b)房屋政策;(三)住房状况。住房研究通常以一种模糊法律关系的方式关注住房政策话语。相反,侧重于财产和住房状况更有可能明确指出在不同情况下产生的权利和义务。权利束?View提供了最可接受的住房权属关系陈述。这是唯一涵盖财产和住房状况的观点,也是唯一能够解释司法化倾向的观点。研究的意义在于关注权利的确切条款、权利在不同当事人之间不断变化的分配以及权利的执行范围。如果研究扩展到审查权利的起源和持续的基本原理,通常需要某种形式的叙事分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信