Factors Influencing the Political Activity of Social Workers: A Comparative Study Among Swiss and United States Social Workers

T. Kindler, Jason Ostrander
{"title":"Factors Influencing the Political Activity of Social Workers: A Comparative Study Among Swiss and United States Social Workers","authors":"T. Kindler, Jason Ostrander","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/j7k4w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various international and national social work ethical principles call social workers to participate in politics, yet not much research exists in the field of a political so-cial work. Little is known about the actual voluntary political engagement of social workers as well as factors influencing their political activity. Especially, few stud-ies with an international comparison focus have been conducted. Consequently, this study used cross sectional survey design to better understand the factors in-fluencing the political activity of social workers in Switzerland (n = 1242) and in the United States (n = 3033). The results indicate that the political activity of so-cial workers is strongly associated with the political influence of parents, with membership in a professional social work association as well as with political effi-cacy. There are some differences between Swiss and US social workers, mainly concerning the influence of memberships in trade unions. As one of few interna-tional practice comparison pieces, this article aims to further stimulate the dis-course on social workers’ political activity. For this purpose, implications for social work education, practice, and research are outlined in the final section.","PeriodicalId":245868,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare","volume":"26 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/j7k4w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Various international and national social work ethical principles call social workers to participate in politics, yet not much research exists in the field of a political so-cial work. Little is known about the actual voluntary political engagement of social workers as well as factors influencing their political activity. Especially, few stud-ies with an international comparison focus have been conducted. Consequently, this study used cross sectional survey design to better understand the factors in-fluencing the political activity of social workers in Switzerland (n = 1242) and in the United States (n = 3033). The results indicate that the political activity of so-cial workers is strongly associated with the political influence of parents, with membership in a professional social work association as well as with political effi-cacy. There are some differences between Swiss and US social workers, mainly concerning the influence of memberships in trade unions. As one of few interna-tional practice comparison pieces, this article aims to further stimulate the dis-course on social workers’ political activity. For this purpose, implications for social work education, practice, and research are outlined in the final section.
影响社会工作者政治活动的因素:瑞士和美国社会工作者的比较研究
国际和各国的社会工作伦理原则都要求社会工作者参与政治,但在政治社会工作领域的研究并不多见。对社会工作者实际的自愿政治参与情况以及影响其政治活动的因素了解甚少。特别是以国际比较为焦点的研究很少。因此,本研究采用横断面调查设计来更好地了解影响瑞士(n = 1242)和美国(n = 3033)社会工作者政治活动的因素。结果表明,社会工作者的政治活动与父母的政治影响、专业社会工作协会的成员资格以及政治效能密切相关。瑞士和美国的社会工作者之间存在一些差异,主要是关于工会成员的影响。作为为数不多的国际实践比较文章之一,本文旨在进一步激发社会工作者政治活动的话语。为此,对社会工作教育、实践和研究的影响将在最后一节中概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信