Normal saccades but decreased fixation stability in a population of children with dyslexia

G. H. Vikesdal, Helle K. Falkenberg, M. Mon-Williams, P. Riddell, T. Langaas
{"title":"Normal saccades but decreased fixation stability in a population of children with dyslexia","authors":"G. H. Vikesdal, Helle K. Falkenberg, M. Mon-Williams, P. Riddell, T. Langaas","doi":"10.5384/sjovs.v14i2.137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nDevelopmental dyslexia affects around 5-15% of the population and has a heterogeneous aetiology. Optometric disorders are more prevalent in dyslexic populations but the relationship be- tween eye movement control and dyslexia is not well established. In this study, we investigated whether children with dyslexia show saccadic or fixation deficits and whether these deficits are related to deficits in visual acuity and/or accommodation. Thirty-four children with and without dyslexia were recruited for the project. All participants had an optometric examination and performed a saccade and fixation experiment. We used two eye movement paradigms: the step and the gap task. Eye movements were recorded by an infrared eye-tracker and saccade and fixation parameters were analysed separately. Saccadic latencies, premature saccades, and directional errors were similar between children with dyslexia and typically developing children. In contrast, fixations were significantly less stable in the dyslexic group. Neither saccades nor fixations were associated with deficits in accommodation or visual acuity. Children with dyslexia showed no difficulties in saccadic performance, but their fixation stability was reduced compared to the control group. The reduced fixation stability can be explained by general deficits in the cognitive processes that underpin eye movement control, that have also been found in other neuro-developmental disorders.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":222252,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5384/sjovs.v14i2.137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developmental dyslexia affects around 5-15% of the population and has a heterogeneous aetiology. Optometric disorders are more prevalent in dyslexic populations but the relationship be- tween eye movement control and dyslexia is not well established. In this study, we investigated whether children with dyslexia show saccadic or fixation deficits and whether these deficits are related to deficits in visual acuity and/or accommodation. Thirty-four children with and without dyslexia were recruited for the project. All participants had an optometric examination and performed a saccade and fixation experiment. We used two eye movement paradigms: the step and the gap task. Eye movements were recorded by an infrared eye-tracker and saccade and fixation parameters were analysed separately. Saccadic latencies, premature saccades, and directional errors were similar between children with dyslexia and typically developing children. In contrast, fixations were significantly less stable in the dyslexic group. Neither saccades nor fixations were associated with deficits in accommodation or visual acuity. Children with dyslexia showed no difficulties in saccadic performance, but their fixation stability was reduced compared to the control group. The reduced fixation stability can be explained by general deficits in the cognitive processes that underpin eye movement control, that have also been found in other neuro-developmental disorders.
阅读障碍儿童群体的正常扫视但固定稳定性下降
发育性阅读障碍影响约5-15%的人口,具有异质性的病因。视光障碍在诵读困难人群中更为普遍,但眼动控制与诵读困难之间的关系尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们调查了患有阅读障碍的儿童是否表现出跳眼或注视缺陷,以及这些缺陷是否与视力和/或适应能力缺陷有关。该项目招募了34名有或没有阅读障碍的儿童。所有参与者都进行了验光检查,并进行了扫视和注视实验。我们使用了两种眼动范式:步动任务和间隙任务。用红外眼动仪记录眼球运动,并分别分析眼跳和注视参数。阅读障碍儿童和正常发育儿童的跳回潜伏期、过早跳回和方向错误相似。相比之下,诵读困难组的注视明显不那么稳定。扫视和注视都与适应能力或视力缺陷无关。有阅读障碍的儿童在跳眼表现上没有困难,但与对照组相比,他们的固定稳定性降低了。注视稳定性的降低可以用支撑眼球运动控制的认知过程的普遍缺陷来解释,这种缺陷在其他神经发育障碍中也有发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信