A prediction based design-for-reliability tool

B. Edson, X. Tian
{"title":"A prediction based design-for-reliability tool","authors":"B. Edson, X. Tian","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today's short product lifecycles, it is especially important to apply design for reliability (DFR) practices as early as possible. Since decisions about which reliability features should be included in a design occur in the context of a system design trade-off process, there then needs to be some way to help design engineers decide which DFR actions have sufficient benefit to outweigh other concerns. An approach to giving design engineers feedback to their decisions from a reliability perspective by using the reliability prediction process is presented. Specific DFR practices are linked to parameters in a reliability prediction model, and a sensitivity analysis allows the design engineer understand the relationship between their choices and the predicted failure rate of the system when it is fielded. An initial implementation of this approach using a standard reliability prediction model, the Telcordia (Bellcore) parts stress prediction model, and some standard rules of thumb from the reliability analysis center's reliability toolkit is described. Finally plans for future evolution and improvement in this approach is discussed.","PeriodicalId":270494,"journal":{"name":"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In today's short product lifecycles, it is especially important to apply design for reliability (DFR) practices as early as possible. Since decisions about which reliability features should be included in a design occur in the context of a system design trade-off process, there then needs to be some way to help design engineers decide which DFR actions have sufficient benefit to outweigh other concerns. An approach to giving design engineers feedback to their decisions from a reliability perspective by using the reliability prediction process is presented. Specific DFR practices are linked to parameters in a reliability prediction model, and a sensitivity analysis allows the design engineer understand the relationship between their choices and the predicted failure rate of the system when it is fielded. An initial implementation of this approach using a standard reliability prediction model, the Telcordia (Bellcore) parts stress prediction model, and some standard rules of thumb from the reliability analysis center's reliability toolkit is described. Finally plans for future evolution and improvement in this approach is discussed.
基于预测的可靠性设计工具
在产品生命周期短的今天,尽早应用可靠性设计(DFR)实践尤为重要。由于关于设计中应该包含哪些可靠性特征的决定发生在系统设计权衡过程的背景下,因此需要一些方法来帮助设计工程师决定哪些DFR动作具有足够的好处,而不是其他关注点。提出了一种利用可靠性预测过程从可靠性角度向设计工程师提供决策反馈的方法。具体的DFR实践与可靠性预测模型中的参数相关联,灵敏度分析使设计工程师能够了解他们的选择与系统部署时预测故障率之间的关系。本文描述了使用标准可靠性预测模型Telcordia (Bellcore)零件应力预测模型以及可靠性分析中心可靠性工具包中的一些标准经验规则来初步实现该方法。最后讨论了该方法未来的发展和改进计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信