{"title":"A prediction based design-for-reliability tool","authors":"B. Edson, X. Tian","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today's short product lifecycles, it is especially important to apply design for reliability (DFR) practices as early as possible. Since decisions about which reliability features should be included in a design occur in the context of a system design trade-off process, there then needs to be some way to help design engineers decide which DFR actions have sufficient benefit to outweigh other concerns. An approach to giving design engineers feedback to their decisions from a reliability perspective by using the reliability prediction process is presented. Specific DFR practices are linked to parameters in a reliability prediction model, and a sensitivity analysis allows the design engineer understand the relationship between their choices and the predicted failure rate of the system when it is fielded. An initial implementation of this approach using a standard reliability prediction model, the Telcordia (Bellcore) parts stress prediction model, and some standard rules of thumb from the reliability analysis center's reliability toolkit is described. Finally plans for future evolution and improvement in this approach is discussed.","PeriodicalId":270494,"journal":{"name":"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
In today's short product lifecycles, it is especially important to apply design for reliability (DFR) practices as early as possible. Since decisions about which reliability features should be included in a design occur in the context of a system design trade-off process, there then needs to be some way to help design engineers decide which DFR actions have sufficient benefit to outweigh other concerns. An approach to giving design engineers feedback to their decisions from a reliability perspective by using the reliability prediction process is presented. Specific DFR practices are linked to parameters in a reliability prediction model, and a sensitivity analysis allows the design engineer understand the relationship between their choices and the predicted failure rate of the system when it is fielded. An initial implementation of this approach using a standard reliability prediction model, the Telcordia (Bellcore) parts stress prediction model, and some standard rules of thumb from the reliability analysis center's reliability toolkit is described. Finally plans for future evolution and improvement in this approach is discussed.