POLÍTICAS DE EVALUACIÓN ESTANDARIZADA Y GOBERNANZA “EMPRESARIAL” EN EDUCACIÓN

Enrique-Javier Díez-Gutiérrez
{"title":"POLÍTICAS DE EVALUACIÓN ESTANDARIZADA Y GOBERNANZA “EMPRESARIAL” EN EDUCACIÓN","authors":"Enrique-Javier Díez-Gutiérrez","doi":"10.15366/jospoe2020.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses closely the policies of standardized evaluation that continue to be implemented throughout the world and which represent one of the most incisive mechanisms of the new paradigm of “neo-liberal governance” in education. It investigates how this evaluation model demands the implementation of new managerial \"business\" style techniques in educational institutions and it is supported by rhetoric that proclaims the necessity of decentralization and of educational autonomy for schools. However, this discourse does not refer to pedagogical autonomy, but to financial autonomy - decentralization without resources. In this context, the so-called \"New Public Management\" comes to the fore as a mechanism of governance for public services, applied to education. The article explores how these stratagems operate, what they \"make one do\"  and how they become tools of social control since they require the active participation of those involved and impose a rationale oriented to \"self-governance\" under the pressure of competition, in accordance with the principle of calculating maximum individual interest. Finally, in a proactive sense, this article raises the need for a different approach to educational evaluation and management that is both possible and necessary in a democratic and inclusive model.","PeriodicalId":431657,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Supranational Policies of Education","volume":"178 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Supranational Policies of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15366/jospoe2020.11.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article analyses closely the policies of standardized evaluation that continue to be implemented throughout the world and which represent one of the most incisive mechanisms of the new paradigm of “neo-liberal governance” in education. It investigates how this evaluation model demands the implementation of new managerial "business" style techniques in educational institutions and it is supported by rhetoric that proclaims the necessity of decentralization and of educational autonomy for schools. However, this discourse does not refer to pedagogical autonomy, but to financial autonomy - decentralization without resources. In this context, the so-called "New Public Management" comes to the fore as a mechanism of governance for public services, applied to education. The article explores how these stratagems operate, what they "make one do"  and how they become tools of social control since they require the active participation of those involved and impose a rationale oriented to "self-governance" under the pressure of competition, in accordance with the principle of calculating maximum individual interest. Finally, in a proactive sense, this article raises the need for a different approach to educational evaluation and management that is both possible and necessary in a democratic and inclusive model.
教育中的标准化评估政策与“公司”治理
本文仔细分析了在世界范围内继续实施的标准化评估政策,这些政策代表了教育领域“新自由主义治理”新范式中最深刻的机制之一。它调查了这种评估模式如何要求在教育机构中实施新的管理“商业”风格技术,并通过宣称学校分权和教育自治的必要性的修辞来支持它。然而,这个话语并不是指教学自治,而是指财政自治——没有资源的分权。在这种背景下,所谓的“新公共管理”作为一种公共服务的治理机制,应用于教育,脱颖而出。本文探讨了这些策略是如何运作的,它们“让人做什么”,以及它们如何成为社会控制的工具,因为它们需要参与者的积极参与,并根据计算个人利益最大化的原则,在竞争压力下强加一种面向“自我治理”的理论基础。最后,在积极的意义上,本文提出了一种不同的教育评估和管理方法的必要性,这种方法在民主和包容的模式中既是可能的也是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信