Chuck out the teacher: critical pedagogy in the community

T. Woodin
{"title":"Chuck out the teacher: critical pedagogy in the community","authors":"T. Woodin","doi":"10.7228/manchester/9780719091117.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The internal workings of working class writing and publishing groups reveals important insights about the nature of democracy. The attempt to form collective and co-operative groups that supported everyone led to an active re-making of educational relationships along democratic lines. The insistence upon equality between writers, irrespective of individual ability, was a cardinal principle. However, in a changing funding climate, workshops came under pressure to formalise relationships, professionalise and introduce management structures. This had mixed results as groups attempted to negotiate these tensions. The example of the Fed brings into question some key aspects of critical pedagogy which privileges the role of tutors and education as a whole and, in some cases, assumes that learners have internalised dominant ideas.","PeriodicalId":123655,"journal":{"name":"Working-class writing and publishing in the late-twentieth century","volume":"284 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Working-class writing and publishing in the late-twentieth century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9780719091117.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The internal workings of working class writing and publishing groups reveals important insights about the nature of democracy. The attempt to form collective and co-operative groups that supported everyone led to an active re-making of educational relationships along democratic lines. The insistence upon equality between writers, irrespective of individual ability, was a cardinal principle. However, in a changing funding climate, workshops came under pressure to formalise relationships, professionalise and introduce management structures. This had mixed results as groups attempted to negotiate these tensions. The example of the Fed brings into question some key aspects of critical pedagogy which privileges the role of tutors and education as a whole and, in some cases, assumes that learners have internalised dominant ideas.
把老师赶出去:社区中的批判教学法
工人阶级写作和出版团体的内部运作揭示了关于民主本质的重要见解。建立支持每个人的集体和合作团体的尝试导致了沿着民主路线积极重建教育关系。坚持作家之间的平等,不管个人能力如何,这是一个基本原则。然而,在不断变化的资助环境下,讲习班面临着使关系正规化、专业化和引入管理结构的压力。当各团体试图协商这些紧张局势时,结果好坏参半。美联储的例子让人们对批判性教学法的一些关键方面产生了质疑,这种教学法把导师和教育作为一个整体赋予了特权,在某些情况下,它假设学习者已经内化了主导思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信