Creating Shared Assets

René P. Orij
{"title":"Creating Shared Assets","authors":"René P. Orij","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2644124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to assess the creation of so-called shared assets, as a long-term result of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities, particularly with regard to the financial sector. Central to the study is the shared value concept by Porter and Kramer (2011). A newly developed quantitative measure of so-called shared assets -- the accounting equivalent of shared value -- is assessed. This suggests a utilitarian motive for CSR within a CSR decision making process. Several theories or models are applied to construct a framework to study the data -- utilitarian ethics, Carroll’s (1991) CSR Pyramid, institutional theory and shared value creation. By focussing on CSR, companies create value that is broader than just financial value. The creation of shared value is similar to self-creation of intangible assets, which are not capitalised. It is hypothesised that CSR activity leads to the creation of shared assets on the long run. In this paper two samples are studied: A rather old sample from 2004, which contains 734 companies from 28 countries, from which 171 from the financial sector from 23 countries and the 2012 sample contains 3,553 companies from 56 countries, including 796 financials. 724 companies appear in both databases, from which 166 are financials. Self-creation of shared assets is similar to the self-creation of non-capitalised goodwill through spending on the improvement of the corporate image. The results of our analysis show only negative associations with financial sector membership. Although statistical evidence is clear, the outcomes may be disturbed by international heterogeneity. This may introduce confounding factors into the cross-sectional dataset. Further analysis is needed to eliminate any disturbing factors. The outcomes of this study provide indications that the rather abstract concepts of shared value and shared assets can operationalised. The discrepancy between expected outcomes and the actual outcomes may suggest a challenge for the financial sector. CSR has its pay-off -- shared assets. This conclusion may lead to a stronger corporate focus on CSR in the future, with possible large social impact. This is the first known accounting study to assess the creation of shared assets and shared value.","PeriodicalId":210981,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact eJournal","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2644124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to assess the creation of so-called shared assets, as a long-term result of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities, particularly with regard to the financial sector. Central to the study is the shared value concept by Porter and Kramer (2011). A newly developed quantitative measure of so-called shared assets -- the accounting equivalent of shared value -- is assessed. This suggests a utilitarian motive for CSR within a CSR decision making process. Several theories or models are applied to construct a framework to study the data -- utilitarian ethics, Carroll’s (1991) CSR Pyramid, institutional theory and shared value creation. By focussing on CSR, companies create value that is broader than just financial value. The creation of shared value is similar to self-creation of intangible assets, which are not capitalised. It is hypothesised that CSR activity leads to the creation of shared assets on the long run. In this paper two samples are studied: A rather old sample from 2004, which contains 734 companies from 28 countries, from which 171 from the financial sector from 23 countries and the 2012 sample contains 3,553 companies from 56 countries, including 796 financials. 724 companies appear in both databases, from which 166 are financials. Self-creation of shared assets is similar to the self-creation of non-capitalised goodwill through spending on the improvement of the corporate image. The results of our analysis show only negative associations with financial sector membership. Although statistical evidence is clear, the outcomes may be disturbed by international heterogeneity. This may introduce confounding factors into the cross-sectional dataset. Further analysis is needed to eliminate any disturbing factors. The outcomes of this study provide indications that the rather abstract concepts of shared value and shared assets can operationalised. The discrepancy between expected outcomes and the actual outcomes may suggest a challenge for the financial sector. CSR has its pay-off -- shared assets. This conclusion may lead to a stronger corporate focus on CSR in the future, with possible large social impact. This is the first known accounting study to assess the creation of shared assets and shared value.
创建共享资产
本文的目的是评估所谓的共享资产的创造,作为企业社会责任(CSR)活动的长期结果,特别是在金融部门方面。该研究的核心是波特和克莱默(2011)的共享价值概念。对所谓的共享资产——共享价值的会计等价物——进行了评估。这表明在企业社会责任决策过程中存在着企业社会责任的功利动机。本文运用了几种理论或模型——功利主义伦理学、卡罗尔(1991)的企业社会责任金字塔、制度理论和共享价值创造——构建了一个研究数据的框架。通过关注企业社会责任,企业创造的价值不仅仅是财务价值。共享价值的创造类似于无形资产的自我创造,后者没有资本化。假设企业社会责任活动导致了长期共享资产的创造。本文研究了两个样本:2004年的样本比较老,包含来自28个国家的734家公司,其中来自23个国家的171家来自金融部门;2012年的样本包含来自56个国家的3553家公司,其中包括796家金融公司。两个数据库中都有724家公司,其中166家是金融类公司。共享资产的自我创造类似于通过改善企业形象的支出而自我创造非资本化商誉。我们的分析结果显示,与金融部门的成员资格只有负相关。虽然统计证据是明确的,但结果可能受到国际异质性的干扰。这可能会在横断面数据集中引入混淆因素。需要进一步分析以消除任何干扰因素。本研究的结果表明,共享价值和共享资产的相当抽象的概念是可以操作的。预期结果与实际结果之间的差异可能意味着金融部门面临挑战。企业社会责任有它的回报——共享资产。这一结论可能会导致企业在未来更加关注企业社会责任,并可能产生巨大的社会影响。这是已知的第一个评估共享资产和共享价值创造的会计研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信