UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF SELECTED PROVISIONS OF THE FAMILY BENEFITS ACT CONCERNING NURSING BENEFIT

Katarzyna Kwaśniewska
{"title":"UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF SELECTED PROVISIONS OF THE FAMILY BENEFITS ACT CONCERNING NURSING BENEFIT","authors":"Katarzyna Kwaśniewska","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.9083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses selected provisions of the nursing benefit in terms of their constitutionality. The article primarily identifies the effects for the decision of the Constitutional Tribunal in the judgment K 38/1. The ruling undermined the constitutionality of Art. 17(1b) of the Act on family benefits, in terms of differentiating the right to a nursing benefit for people caring for a disabled person who has reached the age specified in a given provision in relation to the moment of the appearance of the disability. As a result of the ruling, common problems related to the practice of applying the law arose. The purpose of this article is to examine the constitutionality of selected provisions on the nursing benefit. The author will notice all the problems directed at illegal regulations focusing on the nursing benefit, and will signal feasible ways to solve them\n\n","PeriodicalId":158454,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper discusses selected provisions of the nursing benefit in terms of their constitutionality. The article primarily identifies the effects for the decision of the Constitutional Tribunal in the judgment K 38/1. The ruling undermined the constitutionality of Art. 17(1b) of the Act on family benefits, in terms of differentiating the right to a nursing benefit for people caring for a disabled person who has reached the age specified in a given provision in relation to the moment of the appearance of the disability. As a result of the ruling, common problems related to the practice of applying the law arose. The purpose of this article is to examine the constitutionality of selected provisions on the nursing benefit. The author will notice all the problems directed at illegal regulations focusing on the nursing benefit, and will signal feasible ways to solve them
《家庭福利法》中有关护理福利的部分条款违宪
本文从合宪性的角度对护理福利条款的选择进行了探讨。该条主要指出宪法法庭K 38/1号判决对其决定的影响。该裁决损害了《家庭福利法》第17(1b)条的合宪性,因为它将照顾已达到某一条款所规定的年龄的残疾人的人获得护理福利权与出现残疾的时刻区别对待。由于这一裁决,出现了与适用法律的实践有关的普遍问题。本文的目的是审查有关护理福利的部分规定的合宪性。作者将注意到所有针对以护理利益为中心的非法法规的问题,并将提出可行的解决方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信