SUSTAINABLE SYNTHESIS AND OPTIMIZATION OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS

M. Bogataj, L. Čuček, T. Zula, S. Kravanja, Z. Kravanja
{"title":"SUSTAINABLE SYNTHESIS AND OPTIMIZATION OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS","authors":"M. Bogataj, L. Čuček, T. Zula, S. Kravanja, Z. Kravanja","doi":"10.2495/HPSM180191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The solutions to engineering systems should not only be feasible but should also be beneficial to all the pillars of sustainable development (economic, environmental and social) to the greatest possible extent. However, due to the inherent trade-offs among the three components of sustainable development, identifying such solutions is not a straightforward task. In this manuscript, we present a simultaneous approach for sustainable synthesis and optimization of engineering systems based on a mixed-integer (non)linear programming MI(N)LP. The approach aims at providing sustainable solutions and an insight into the trade-offs among the economic, environmental and social component of sustainable development. Maximization of a sustainability profit, which is a composite criterion comprised of economic, ecoand social profits, is applied in order to obtain the optimal sustainable solutions. The solutions are compared to those obtained by maximizing either pure economic profit or minimizing Green House Gas emissions. The approach is tested on two case studies and the results are compared. The first example is a simple example from the field of civil engineering. The example presents the synthesis/optimization of a 5.5 meters long cantilever beams. The second example represents supply chain synthesis/optimisation of a biogas production plant in Slovenia. The results for the first case study indicate that 23% increase in sustainability profit causes slight decrease in economic profit (6%). On the other hand, the results for the second case study indicate that a slight increase in sustainability profit (6%) causes a 27% decrease in economic profit. Nevertheless, the solutions obtained by maximizing the sustainability profit remain economically viable due to its composite nature that properly captures and reflects the trade-offs.","PeriodicalId":340058,"journal":{"name":"High Performance and Optimum Design of Structures and Materials III","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High Performance and Optimum Design of Structures and Materials III","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/HPSM180191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The solutions to engineering systems should not only be feasible but should also be beneficial to all the pillars of sustainable development (economic, environmental and social) to the greatest possible extent. However, due to the inherent trade-offs among the three components of sustainable development, identifying such solutions is not a straightforward task. In this manuscript, we present a simultaneous approach for sustainable synthesis and optimization of engineering systems based on a mixed-integer (non)linear programming MI(N)LP. The approach aims at providing sustainable solutions and an insight into the trade-offs among the economic, environmental and social component of sustainable development. Maximization of a sustainability profit, which is a composite criterion comprised of economic, ecoand social profits, is applied in order to obtain the optimal sustainable solutions. The solutions are compared to those obtained by maximizing either pure economic profit or minimizing Green House Gas emissions. The approach is tested on two case studies and the results are compared. The first example is a simple example from the field of civil engineering. The example presents the synthesis/optimization of a 5.5 meters long cantilever beams. The second example represents supply chain synthesis/optimisation of a biogas production plant in Slovenia. The results for the first case study indicate that 23% increase in sustainability profit causes slight decrease in economic profit (6%). On the other hand, the results for the second case study indicate that a slight increase in sustainability profit (6%) causes a 27% decrease in economic profit. Nevertheless, the solutions obtained by maximizing the sustainability profit remain economically viable due to its composite nature that properly captures and reflects the trade-offs.
工程系统的可持续综合与优化
工程系统的解决方案不仅应该是可行的,而且应该在最大程度上有利于可持续发展的所有支柱(经济、环境和社会)。然而,由于可持续发展的三个组成部分之间的内在权衡,确定这种解决办法并不是一项直截了当的任务。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于混合整数(非线性)规划MI(N)LP的工程系统可持续综合和优化的同时方法。该办法旨在提供可持续的解决办法,并深入了解可持续发展的经济、环境和社会组成部分之间的权衡。为了获得最优的可持续解决方案,采用了可持续利润最大化,这是一个由经济、生态和社会利润组成的复合准则。将这些解决方案与最大化纯经济利润或最小化温室气体排放的解决方案进行比较。在两个案例中对该方法进行了测试,并对结果进行了比较。第一个例子是土木工程领域的一个简单例子。以5.5米长悬臂梁为例进行了综合优化。第二个例子代表斯洛文尼亚沼气生产工厂的供应链综合/优化。第一个案例研究的结果表明,可持续发展利润增加23%导致经济利润略有下降(6%)。另一方面,第二个案例研究的结果表明,可持续发展利润(6%)的轻微增加导致经济利润下降27%。然而,通过最大化可持续性利润获得的解决方案在经济上仍然是可行的,因为它的综合性质,适当地捕捉和反映了权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信