Responsible Gambling

P. Delfabbro, Daniel L. King
{"title":"Responsible Gambling","authors":"P. Delfabbro, Daniel L. King","doi":"10.1093/med-psych/9780190074562.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines how academics working in the field of gambling studies understand the concept of responsible gambling (RG). The authors begin with a discussion of the concept, theory, and objectives underpinning RG. They discuss the varying definitions of RG and how it has been featured in recent applications of public health theory in the gambling field. The authors consider the strengths and weaknesses of RG principles and then examine how understanding of RG might differ across different stakeholder groups (e.g., academics, the industry, and community welfare groups) and how this influences the practical application of RG principles. This is followed by analysis of the evidence available concerning the application of RG principles to practical situations as well as the facilitators and barriers to effective RG research. The authors conclude with a discussion of academic views about how to enhance research evidence and the practical application of RG principles.","PeriodicalId":384629,"journal":{"name":"Responsible Gambling","volume":"438 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Responsible Gambling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med-psych/9780190074562.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter examines how academics working in the field of gambling studies understand the concept of responsible gambling (RG). The authors begin with a discussion of the concept, theory, and objectives underpinning RG. They discuss the varying definitions of RG and how it has been featured in recent applications of public health theory in the gambling field. The authors consider the strengths and weaknesses of RG principles and then examine how understanding of RG might differ across different stakeholder groups (e.g., academics, the industry, and community welfare groups) and how this influences the practical application of RG principles. This is followed by analysis of the evidence available concerning the application of RG principles to practical situations as well as the facilitators and barriers to effective RG research. The authors conclude with a discussion of academic views about how to enhance research evidence and the practical application of RG principles.
负责任的赌博
本章探讨了在赌博研究领域工作的学者如何理解负责任赌博(RG)的概念。作者首先讨论了支持RG的概念、理论和目标。他们讨论了RG的不同定义,以及它在最近公共卫生理论在赌博领域的应用中的特点。作者考虑了RG原则的优点和缺点,然后研究了不同利益相关者群体(例如,学术界,工业界和社区福利团体)对RG的理解如何不同,以及这如何影响RG原则的实际应用。随后分析了有关将RG原则应用于实际情况的现有证据,以及有效的RG研究的促进因素和障碍。最后,作者讨论了如何加强研究证据和RG原则的实际应用的学术观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信