CORRELATIONAL INFERENCES FROM TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION 2017 WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKING

Ali Baykal
{"title":"CORRELATIONAL INFERENCES FROM TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION 2017 WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKING","authors":"Ali Baykal","doi":"10.17261/PRESSACADEMIA.2017.371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose- If knowledge is a strategic commodity as asserted by so many scholars then the amount and the quality of service provided by the universities are to be assessed in a variety of ways. The general aim of this study is to extract some information from the available evidence about tertiary education. The purpose in operational terms is to make use of data published by Times Higher Education (THE) 2016-17 World University Rankings, and United Nations Development Program (UNDP).   Methodology- Pearson correlation is the statistical method used to make inferences. The variables correlated are the measures taken by Times Higher Education in 2016-17.  Namely, these are Teaching, Research, Citations and International Outlook. Some Human Development Indicators (HDI) are the variables used as benchmarking criteria taken from Human Development Report 2014 published by UNDP. These are HDI-2012, Research and Development Expenditure, Educational Expenditures, PISA-2012 Scores.  Findings- The computations yields mostly positive high correlations between pairs of variables mentioned above. General Educational Expenditure seems to be the variable correlated not so significantly with the others.  Conclusion- The present report displays results in conformity with the expectations. Conclusions are valid for the countries in general and for Turkey in particular separately as well as for the whole bunch of universities. The author hopes to collect critical and complementary comments in return.","PeriodicalId":376357,"journal":{"name":"Research Journal of Business Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Journal of Business Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17261/PRESSACADEMIA.2017.371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose- If knowledge is a strategic commodity as asserted by so many scholars then the amount and the quality of service provided by the universities are to be assessed in a variety of ways. The general aim of this study is to extract some information from the available evidence about tertiary education. The purpose in operational terms is to make use of data published by Times Higher Education (THE) 2016-17 World University Rankings, and United Nations Development Program (UNDP).   Methodology- Pearson correlation is the statistical method used to make inferences. The variables correlated are the measures taken by Times Higher Education in 2016-17.  Namely, these are Teaching, Research, Citations and International Outlook. Some Human Development Indicators (HDI) are the variables used as benchmarking criteria taken from Human Development Report 2014 published by UNDP. These are HDI-2012, Research and Development Expenditure, Educational Expenditures, PISA-2012 Scores.  Findings- The computations yields mostly positive high correlations between pairs of variables mentioned above. General Educational Expenditure seems to be the variable correlated not so significantly with the others.  Conclusion- The present report displays results in conformity with the expectations. Conclusions are valid for the countries in general and for Turkey in particular separately as well as for the whole bunch of universities. The author hopes to collect critical and complementary comments in return.
来自《泰晤士高等教育》2017年世界大学排名的相关推论
目的——如果知识是一种战略商品,正如许多学者所断言的那样,那么大学提供的服务的数量和质量将以各种方式进行评估。本研究的总体目的是从现有的高等教育证据中提取一些信息。在操作方面的目的是利用泰晤士高等教育(The) 2016-17年世界大学排名和联合国开发计划署(UNDP)发布的数据。方法-皮尔逊相关性是用于推断的统计方法。相关变量为泰晤士高等教育在2016-17年采取的措施。即教学、研究、引文和国际视野。一些人类发展指标(HDI)是联合国开发计划署发布的《2014年人类发展报告》中用作基准标准的变量。这些是2012年人类发展指数、研发支出、教育支出、2012年pisa分数。结果-计算结果在上述变量对之间产生了大部分正的高相关性。一般教育支出似乎是与其他变量相关性不太显著的变量。结论-本报告显示的结果与预期相符。结论对整个国家都是有效的,对土耳其尤其如此,对所有大学都是有效的。作者希望收集批评和补充意见作为回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信