The Grounds for Consideration of Cases in the Simplified Procedure

A. Y. Staritsyn
{"title":"The Grounds for Consideration of Cases in the Simplified Procedure","authors":"A. Y. Staritsyn","doi":"10.26516/2071-8136.2022.1.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article highlights the new russian model of legal regulation of simplified proceedings in the civil process, also notes the incompleteness the reform of the civil procedure legislation (begun in 2016), which having negatively affects. In this research, the author focuses on the controversial aspects of the simplified procedure for considering individual civil cases, which based on the provisions of the legislation, on the established principles of judicial practice and the conclusions of doctrinal research. Also the author research of these materials, using by general scientific and special legal methods, including systemic, materialistic, formal legal methods and etc. A brief description of the grounds for considering civil cases in a simplified manner is given, the acceptability of currently allocated in Art. 232.2 Chapter 21.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation of categories of cases, as well as gaps in legal regulation that should be eliminated. The corresponding judicial practice is presented, the analysis of which leads to disappointing conclusions. It is noted that the study of this issue is due, among other things, to the lack of clarity in the relationship between the order, simplified and claim proceedings. In parallel, the relationship between the grounds for considering cases in a simplified procedure and legal norms regulating other aspects of the simplified procedure (making a court decision, accepting a statement of claim for consideration according to the rules of simplified proceedings) is substantiated, the integral legal regulation must comply with the essence of the requirements considered in the civil process. A legal assessment is made of the legislative identification of mandatory and dispositive grounds for considering a case in a simplified manner for compliance with the fundamental principles of civil procedure. The admissibility of limiting the principle of dispositiveness in the simplified production of the civil procedure is substantiated, which is a consequence of the desire to achieve a balance between public and private interests. Recommendations have been developed for the further improvement of civil procedural norms on simplified proceedings in terms of the list of categories of cases to be considered in accordance with the rules of Chapter 21.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation.","PeriodicalId":126097,"journal":{"name":"Siberian Law Herald","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siberian Law Herald","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26516/2071-8136.2022.1.113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article highlights the new russian model of legal regulation of simplified proceedings in the civil process, also notes the incompleteness the reform of the civil procedure legislation (begun in 2016), which having negatively affects. In this research, the author focuses on the controversial aspects of the simplified procedure for considering individual civil cases, which based on the provisions of the legislation, on the established principles of judicial practice and the conclusions of doctrinal research. Also the author research of these materials, using by general scientific and special legal methods, including systemic, materialistic, formal legal methods and etc. A brief description of the grounds for considering civil cases in a simplified manner is given, the acceptability of currently allocated in Art. 232.2 Chapter 21.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation of categories of cases, as well as gaps in legal regulation that should be eliminated. The corresponding judicial practice is presented, the analysis of which leads to disappointing conclusions. It is noted that the study of this issue is due, among other things, to the lack of clarity in the relationship between the order, simplified and claim proceedings. In parallel, the relationship between the grounds for considering cases in a simplified procedure and legal norms regulating other aspects of the simplified procedure (making a court decision, accepting a statement of claim for consideration according to the rules of simplified proceedings) is substantiated, the integral legal regulation must comply with the essence of the requirements considered in the civil process. A legal assessment is made of the legislative identification of mandatory and dispositive grounds for considering a case in a simplified manner for compliance with the fundamental principles of civil procedure. The admissibility of limiting the principle of dispositiveness in the simplified production of the civil procedure is substantiated, which is a consequence of the desire to achieve a balance between public and private interests. Recommendations have been developed for the further improvement of civil procedural norms on simplified proceedings in terms of the list of categories of cases to be considered in accordance with the rules of Chapter 21.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation.
简化程序中审议案件的理由
文章重点介绍了俄罗斯简化民事诉讼程序的法律规制新模式,也指出了民事诉讼立法改革的不完整(始于2016年),这产生了负面影响。本文从立法的规定、司法实践的既定原则和理论研究的结论出发,对我国简易民事案件审理程序存在的争议进行了探讨。并运用一般的科学的和特殊的法律方法,包括系统的、唯物的、形式的法律方法等,对这些材料进行研究。简要说明了以简化方式审议民事案件的理由,《俄罗斯联邦民事诉讼法》第21.1章第232.2条目前规定的各类案件的可接受性,以及应当消除的法律规定中的漏洞。提出了相应的司法实践,对其进行了分析,得出了令人失望的结论。有人指出,对这个问题进行研究,除其他外,是由于命令程序、简化程序和索赔程序之间的关系不明确。同时,简化程序审议案件的理由与规范简化程序其他方面的法律规范(根据简化程序规则作出判决、接受请求陈述书)之间的关系得到证实,整体法律规定必须符合民事程序审议要求的本质。法律评估是为了遵守民事诉讼的基本原则,以简化方式审议案件的强制性和酌处性理由的立法鉴定。限制处分原则在简化民事诉讼程序中的可接受性得到了证实,这是实现公私利益平衡的结果。已就根据《俄罗斯联邦民事诉讼法》第21.1章的规则审议的案件类别清单,进一步改进简化诉讼程序的民事诉讼规范提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信