Does the quality of the home environment influence the functional abilities of infants in early childhood?

Mylena Francielle R. Lima, L. B. Costa, Daniel Gonçalves Pereira, W. Gomes, Vinícius C. Oliveira, R. L. S. Morais
{"title":"Does the quality of the home environment influence the functional abilities of infants in early childhood?","authors":"Mylena Francielle R. Lima, L. B. Costa, Daniel Gonçalves Pereira, W. Gomes, Vinícius C. Oliveira, R. L. S. Morais","doi":"10.1590/1809-2950/21025429022022en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The literature associates child development with the quality of the environment stimulation. However, few studies verify if this is associated with the infant’s functional abilities. This study aims to assess which opportunities in the home environment are associated with functional mobility skills and social function of infants in early childhood and explain them. This is a cross-sectional and exploratory study with 74 infants aged from six to 18 months. The affordances in the home environment motor development - infant scale instrument was used to evaluate the opportunities in the home environment. The pediatric evaluation of disability inventory was used to assess the infants’ functional abilities. We observed that infants’ mobility can be explained in 45.6% (Adjusted R²=0.45) and social function in 30% (Adjusted R²=0.30) by the amount of gross motor skills toys, equipment and variety of stimulation in the home environment. We concluded that positions, toys, and materials that keep the infant more restricted and less active have a negative effect. On the other hand, toys that offer greater displacement and interaction favor the functional mobility skills and social function.","PeriodicalId":436434,"journal":{"name":"Fisioterapia e Pesquisa","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisioterapia e Pesquisa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/21025429022022en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The literature associates child development with the quality of the environment stimulation. However, few studies verify if this is associated with the infant’s functional abilities. This study aims to assess which opportunities in the home environment are associated with functional mobility skills and social function of infants in early childhood and explain them. This is a cross-sectional and exploratory study with 74 infants aged from six to 18 months. The affordances in the home environment motor development - infant scale instrument was used to evaluate the opportunities in the home environment. The pediatric evaluation of disability inventory was used to assess the infants’ functional abilities. We observed that infants’ mobility can be explained in 45.6% (Adjusted R²=0.45) and social function in 30% (Adjusted R²=0.30) by the amount of gross motor skills toys, equipment and variety of stimulation in the home environment. We concluded that positions, toys, and materials that keep the infant more restricted and less active have a negative effect. On the other hand, toys that offer greater displacement and interaction favor the functional mobility skills and social function.
家庭环境质量是否影响幼儿期婴儿的功能能力?
文献将儿童发育与环境刺激的质量联系起来。然而,很少有研究证实这是否与婴儿的功能能力有关。本研究旨在评估家庭环境中哪些机会与幼儿期婴儿的功能活动技能和社会功能相关,并对其进行解释。这是一项对74名6至18个月大的婴儿进行的横断面探索性研究。运用幼儿运动发展量表评估幼儿在家庭环境中的机会。采用儿童残疾量表评估婴儿的功能能力。我们发现,有45.6%的婴儿的行动能力(调整后的R²=0.45)和30%的婴儿的社会功能(调整后的R²=0.30)可以通过家庭环境中大动作技能玩具、设备的数量和各种刺激来解释。我们的结论是,姿势、玩具和让婴儿更受限制、更少活动的材料会产生负面影响。另一方面,提供更大位移和互动的玩具有利于功能性移动技能和社交功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信