{"title":"Collective decision-making algorithm for the best-of-n problem in multiple options","authors":"M. Kubo, Hiroshi Sato, Nhuhai Phung, A. Yamaguchi","doi":"10.1080/18824889.2022.2077588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The best-of-n problem [Valentini G, Ferrante E, Dorigo M. The best-of-n problem in robot swarms: formalization, state of the art, and novel perspectives. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 2017;4(9):1–18.] is a collective decision-making problem in which many robots (agents) select the best option among a set of n alternatives and is focused on the field of distributed autonomous robotic systems and swarm robotics. It is desirable to develop a collective decision-making algorithm that can work even when there are a lot of social–behavioural alternatives (n>2) to realize an intelligent system that can solve more complicated problems. However, previous studies mainly focused on binary collective decision-making scenarios (n = 2). In this paper, we propose a collective decision-making algorithm for the best-of-n problem with a large number of options by using short-term experience memory with a trial and error approach at the group level. After proposing this decision-making process, we show typical behaviour. Next, we show the convergence of this algorithm when a quadratic function is used for the bias corresponding to the individual characteristic. Next, the bias distribution proposed shows that an equilibrium point where all candidates have the same number of supports is unstable, and consensus states are a stable fixed point. Therefore, dynamics is expected to converge towards a consensus. Simulation results and mathematical analysis show that the average time required to find the best option is nearly proportional to the number of options and does not depend on the number of robots.","PeriodicalId":413922,"journal":{"name":"SICE journal of control, measurement, and system integration","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SICE journal of control, measurement, and system integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18824889.2022.2077588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The best-of-n problem [Valentini G, Ferrante E, Dorigo M. The best-of-n problem in robot swarms: formalization, state of the art, and novel perspectives. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 2017;4(9):1–18.] is a collective decision-making problem in which many robots (agents) select the best option among a set of n alternatives and is focused on the field of distributed autonomous robotic systems and swarm robotics. It is desirable to develop a collective decision-making algorithm that can work even when there are a lot of social–behavioural alternatives (n>2) to realize an intelligent system that can solve more complicated problems. However, previous studies mainly focused on binary collective decision-making scenarios (n = 2). In this paper, we propose a collective decision-making algorithm for the best-of-n problem with a large number of options by using short-term experience memory with a trial and error approach at the group level. After proposing this decision-making process, we show typical behaviour. Next, we show the convergence of this algorithm when a quadratic function is used for the bias corresponding to the individual characteristic. Next, the bias distribution proposed shows that an equilibrium point where all candidates have the same number of supports is unstable, and consensus states are a stable fixed point. Therefore, dynamics is expected to converge towards a consensus. Simulation results and mathematical analysis show that the average time required to find the best option is nearly proportional to the number of options and does not depend on the number of robots.