Availability of Quality Standards in the Special Education Program at Majmaah University - Saudi Arabia, from the Perspectives of Teachers and 8th level Students

Omar Khalil Mousa Atiyat, A. Alothman, Mamoun " Mohammad Jamil " Omar Hasoneh
{"title":"Availability of Quality Standards in the Special Education Program at Majmaah University - Saudi Arabia, from the Perspectives of Teachers and 8th level Students","authors":"Omar Khalil Mousa Atiyat, A. Alothman, Mamoun \" Mohammad Jamil \" Omar Hasoneh","doi":"10.20428/ajqahe.v10i32.1245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to assess to what extent the quality standards in the Special Education Program at Majmaah University, were available from the point of view of faculty members and 8th level students who were expected to graduate, in the light of a number of variables. To achieve the objectives of the study, the researcher  used a  descriptive survey method and developed a questionnaire, consisting of six areas:  (objectives of the program, teaching methods, and curriculum,  students’ evaluation, facilities and services, and field training). The study sample consisted of all faculty members at the Department of Special Education in the College of Education, totaling (42) faculty members, and (62) 8th Level students who were expected to graduate in the academic year 2015 / 2016.  The study results revealed the availability of quality standards in the program to a high degree from the point of view of faculty members, and in all the areas of the questionnaire, with a slight variation between these areas  \"standards \". The standard “objectives of the program” ranked first, while the standard “facilities and services” ranked last. From the students’ perspective, on the other hand, the results indicated that  quality standards, which are related to program objectives only, were available in the program  to a high degree. In other areas of the questionnaire, students’ perspectives had a medium degree. The results of the study did not show any significant differences at the level (α = 0.05) between the means of the faculty members perspectives, attributed to the variables (gender, years of experience), but there were statistically significant differences (α=0.05), attributed to the impact of level of education, in favor of MA and PhD holders. Also, the results did not reveal any significant differences at the level (α = 0.05) between the means of the students’ perspectives due to the variable (GPA, gender). \nKeywords: Graduate students, Majmaah University, Quality standards; Special education program.","PeriodicalId":300044,"journal":{"name":"The Arab Journal For Quality Assurance in Higher Education","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Arab Journal For Quality Assurance in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20428/ajqahe.v10i32.1245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess to what extent the quality standards in the Special Education Program at Majmaah University, were available from the point of view of faculty members and 8th level students who were expected to graduate, in the light of a number of variables. To achieve the objectives of the study, the researcher  used a  descriptive survey method and developed a questionnaire, consisting of six areas:  (objectives of the program, teaching methods, and curriculum,  students’ evaluation, facilities and services, and field training). The study sample consisted of all faculty members at the Department of Special Education in the College of Education, totaling (42) faculty members, and (62) 8th Level students who were expected to graduate in the academic year 2015 / 2016.  The study results revealed the availability of quality standards in the program to a high degree from the point of view of faculty members, and in all the areas of the questionnaire, with a slight variation between these areas  "standards ". The standard “objectives of the program” ranked first, while the standard “facilities and services” ranked last. From the students’ perspective, on the other hand, the results indicated that  quality standards, which are related to program objectives only, were available in the program  to a high degree. In other areas of the questionnaire, students’ perspectives had a medium degree. The results of the study did not show any significant differences at the level (α = 0.05) between the means of the faculty members perspectives, attributed to the variables (gender, years of experience), but there were statistically significant differences (α=0.05), attributed to the impact of level of education, in favor of MA and PhD holders. Also, the results did not reveal any significant differences at the level (α = 0.05) between the means of the students’ perspectives due to the variable (GPA, gender). Keywords: Graduate students, Majmaah University, Quality standards; Special education program.
从教师和8年级学生的角度看,沙特阿拉伯Majmaah大学特殊教育项目中质量标准的可用性
这项研究的目的是评估Majmaah大学特殊教育项目的质量标准在多大程度上可以从教师和即将毕业的八年级学生的角度出发,根据一些变量进行评估。为了达到研究的目的,研究者采用了描述性调查方法,并制定了一份调查问卷,包括六个方面:(项目目标,教学方法和课程,学生评价,设施和服务,现场培训)。研究样本包括教育学院特殊教育系的所有教职员工,共计(42)名教职员工和(62)名预计将于2015 / 2016学年毕业的八年级学生。研究结果显示,从教师的角度来看,该计划的质量标准在很大程度上是可用的,并且在问卷的所有领域都是如此,这些领域的“标准”之间略有差异。“项目目标”标准排名第一,“设施和服务”标准排名最后。另一方面,从学生的角度来看,结果表明,仅与项目目标相关的质量标准在项目中是高度可用的。在问卷的其他领域,学生的观点为中等程度。研究结果显示,受性别、工作年限等变量影响,教师观点均值在水平上无显著差异(α=0.05),但受教育程度影响,具有统计学显著差异(α=0.05),有利于硕士和博士。此外,由于GPA、性别等变量的影响,学生的观点均值在水平上没有显著差异(α = 0.05)。关键词:研究生,Majmaah大学,质量标准;特殊教育项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信