{"title":"TR12 Nu2Sim simulation training increases knowledge and confidence with new to simulation users","authors":"J. Stratford, N. Jenkins","doi":"10.1136/BMJSTEL-2018-ASPIHCONF.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction At Northumbria, we run a Simulation Faculty development course which is aimed at those who are already involved in simulation teaching. We identified that there was a lack of training for those new to simulation who would like to be part of a faculty but have little or no knowledge about simulation and the technology used. NU2Sim offers familiarisation to the manikins; the set up and equipment; exploration of the software; scenario set up and how to achieve basic programming. Nu2Sim was offered to Inter-professional learners and was intended to enable them to feel more confident and get the best out of simulation based training and education. Methods Three courses were run over a period of three months to a variety of allied health professionals (AHP’s) new to simulation. The aims were to introduce attendees to simulation and explore the technology in easy steps and to enable them to utilise the manikins and understand the software that would allow them to get the most out of their scenarios. The participants completed evaluation forms to compare confidence and knowledge before and after the course. Results A Likert scale of 1–5 was used for four questions and free text comments were encouraged. Pre-course, most participants rated their knowledge of simulation manikins; software; programming themes and confidence using simulation based teaching from 1–3 (‘very poor’, ‘poor’ or ‘neutral’) and post-course from 4–5 (‘good or ‘very good’). Free text comments were generally very positive and supportive for the need of this course. Very few changes were suggested. Discussion and Conclusions More concise results would be gained from more participants attending, short notice cancellations due to clinical needs reduced numbers. There is a need for Nu2Sim as it has shown that it increases knowledge and confidence in simulation based education and helps reduce fears, doubts or misconceptions regarding simulation, therefore enhancing the learning/teaching experience. How do we retain previous participants as members of future faculty? Recommendations Nu2Sim will be planned well in advance with reminders in the hope of reducing late cancellations. We need to encourage Nu2Sim participants to develop further skills, join simulation faculty and utilise training.","PeriodicalId":330662,"journal":{"name":"TECH room – short communications","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TECH room – short communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJSTEL-2018-ASPIHCONF.77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction At Northumbria, we run a Simulation Faculty development course which is aimed at those who are already involved in simulation teaching. We identified that there was a lack of training for those new to simulation who would like to be part of a faculty but have little or no knowledge about simulation and the technology used. NU2Sim offers familiarisation to the manikins; the set up and equipment; exploration of the software; scenario set up and how to achieve basic programming. Nu2Sim was offered to Inter-professional learners and was intended to enable them to feel more confident and get the best out of simulation based training and education. Methods Three courses were run over a period of three months to a variety of allied health professionals (AHP’s) new to simulation. The aims were to introduce attendees to simulation and explore the technology in easy steps and to enable them to utilise the manikins and understand the software that would allow them to get the most out of their scenarios. The participants completed evaluation forms to compare confidence and knowledge before and after the course. Results A Likert scale of 1–5 was used for four questions and free text comments were encouraged. Pre-course, most participants rated their knowledge of simulation manikins; software; programming themes and confidence using simulation based teaching from 1–3 (‘very poor’, ‘poor’ or ‘neutral’) and post-course from 4–5 (‘good or ‘very good’). Free text comments were generally very positive and supportive for the need of this course. Very few changes were suggested. Discussion and Conclusions More concise results would be gained from more participants attending, short notice cancellations due to clinical needs reduced numbers. There is a need for Nu2Sim as it has shown that it increases knowledge and confidence in simulation based education and helps reduce fears, doubts or misconceptions regarding simulation, therefore enhancing the learning/teaching experience. How do we retain previous participants as members of future faculty? Recommendations Nu2Sim will be planned well in advance with reminders in the hope of reducing late cancellations. We need to encourage Nu2Sim participants to develop further skills, join simulation faculty and utilise training.