What's Draining Your Wallet? The Real Cost of Credit Card Cash Advances

Joshua M. Frank
{"title":"What's Draining Your Wallet? The Real Cost of Credit Card Cash Advances","authors":"Joshua M. Frank","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1457105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Americans have come to rely on their credit cards as both a form of payment for purchases and a flexible way to borrow cash. The total amount of credit card debt is approaching a trillion dollars. Credit cards are a key source of revenue for financial institutions and usually among the most profitable loan products available today.Credit card pricing has become highly complex and increasingly difficult for borrowers to follow. Credit card issuers at one time charged a single fixed interest rate to all customers and now charge individual customers several different varying interest rates at once, some of which expire after a short time period, and some rates suddenly changing to 'penalty rates' under certain conditions. The number and importance of fees charged to consumers has also grown dramatically.While there has been significant public discussion of certain hidden fees that are common on credit cards, manipulating how consumers’ payments are allocated towards a borrower’s balance is another hidden charge that can impose significant costs on the borrower without their knowledge. Borrowers can have balances on the same card at several different rates at once such as a purchase balance, a temporary promotional - or 'teaser' - balance and a high-rate cash advance balance. By putting all of the payment toward the lowest rate balance (typically the purchase balance or teaser balance), issuers can in effect substantially raise the interest rates paid by borrowers.This report demonstrates that this ordering of payments or 'payment allocation' policy can be both expensive and confusing for credit card customers who, as a group, have little knowledge of the mechanics or cost. The data analyzed in this report shows that allocating payments to the lowest rate first is harmful to borrowers, highly deceptive, and inconsistent with risk-based pricing. More specifically the study finds the system is stacked against borrowers in the following ways:Payment allocation forces borrowers to pay the highest prices, as much as 7 percentage points higher. By paying the lower-cost purchase balance first, payment allocation increases the borrower’s other balances and effectively raises the total interest paid by the borrower. As a result of payment allocation abuses, some borrowers with credit card debt pay as much as $700 extra each year. Customers are unaware of the significance and impact of these hidden charges. Only 3% of borrowers surveyed have the knowledge and capacity to evaluate credit card companies’ payment allocation policies.Payment allocation distorts risk-based pricing. When all measures of risk are taken into account, our analysis reveals the opposite of risk-based pricing. Lower risk customers pay significantly higher interest rates compared to high-risk borrowers.","PeriodicalId":175183,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Payment Systems (Sub-Topic)","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Payment Systems (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1457105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Americans have come to rely on their credit cards as both a form of payment for purchases and a flexible way to borrow cash. The total amount of credit card debt is approaching a trillion dollars. Credit cards are a key source of revenue for financial institutions and usually among the most profitable loan products available today.Credit card pricing has become highly complex and increasingly difficult for borrowers to follow. Credit card issuers at one time charged a single fixed interest rate to all customers and now charge individual customers several different varying interest rates at once, some of which expire after a short time period, and some rates suddenly changing to 'penalty rates' under certain conditions. The number and importance of fees charged to consumers has also grown dramatically.While there has been significant public discussion of certain hidden fees that are common on credit cards, manipulating how consumers’ payments are allocated towards a borrower’s balance is another hidden charge that can impose significant costs on the borrower without their knowledge. Borrowers can have balances on the same card at several different rates at once such as a purchase balance, a temporary promotional - or 'teaser' - balance and a high-rate cash advance balance. By putting all of the payment toward the lowest rate balance (typically the purchase balance or teaser balance), issuers can in effect substantially raise the interest rates paid by borrowers.This report demonstrates that this ordering of payments or 'payment allocation' policy can be both expensive and confusing for credit card customers who, as a group, have little knowledge of the mechanics or cost. The data analyzed in this report shows that allocating payments to the lowest rate first is harmful to borrowers, highly deceptive, and inconsistent with risk-based pricing. More specifically the study finds the system is stacked against borrowers in the following ways:Payment allocation forces borrowers to pay the highest prices, as much as 7 percentage points higher. By paying the lower-cost purchase balance first, payment allocation increases the borrower’s other balances and effectively raises the total interest paid by the borrower. As a result of payment allocation abuses, some borrowers with credit card debt pay as much as $700 extra each year. Customers are unaware of the significance and impact of these hidden charges. Only 3% of borrowers surveyed have the knowledge and capacity to evaluate credit card companies’ payment allocation policies.Payment allocation distorts risk-based pricing. When all measures of risk are taken into account, our analysis reveals the opposite of risk-based pricing. Lower risk customers pay significantly higher interest rates compared to high-risk borrowers.
什么在榨干你的钱包?信用卡现金预支的实际成本
美国人已经开始依赖他们的信用卡,它既是一种购物支付方式,也是一种灵活的借贷方式。信用卡债务总额接近一万亿美元。信用卡是金融机构的主要收入来源,通常也是当今最赚钱的贷款产品之一。信用卡定价已经变得非常复杂,借款人越来越难以遵循。信用卡发卡机构一度向所有客户收取单一的固定利率,现在则同时向个人客户收取几种不同的利率,其中一些利率在短时间内到期,有些利率在某些条件下突然变为“惩罚性利率”。向消费者收取的费用的数量和重要性也急剧增加。虽然公众对信用卡中常见的某些隐藏费用进行了大量讨论,但操纵消费者的付款如何分配给借款人的余额是另一种隐藏费用,可以在借款人不知情的情况下给借款人带来巨大成本。借款人可以同时在同一张卡上以几种不同的利率保持余额,例如购买余额、临时促销余额或“引诱”余额和高利率现金预支余额。通过将所有的付款都放在最低利率余额(通常是购买余额或挑逗余额)上,发行者实际上可以大幅提高借款人支付的利率。这份报告表明,这种付款顺序或“付款分配”政策对于信用卡客户来说既昂贵又令人困惑,因为他们作为一个群体,对机制或成本知之甚少。本报告分析的数据表明,首先将付款分配给最低利率对借款人有害,具有高度欺骗性,并且与基于风险的定价不一致。更具体地说,该研究发现,该系统在以下方面不利于借款人:还款分配迫使借款人支付最高的价格,最高可达7个百分点。通过先支付成本较低的购买余额,支付分配增加了借款人的其他余额,有效地提高了借款人支付的利息总额。由于支付分配不当,一些有信用卡债务的借款人每年多支付多达700美元。客户没有意识到这些隐性费用的重要性和影响。只有3%的受访借款人有知识和能力评估信用卡公司的支付分配政策。支付分配扭曲了基于风险的定价。当考虑到所有的风险度量时,我们的分析揭示了基于风险的定价的对立面。与高风险借款人相比,低风险客户支付的利率要高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信