Feminist Legal Theory dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung; Studi Analisis Hukum Islam

Iin Aulia Mahardini, Siti Aisyah
{"title":"Feminist Legal Theory dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung; Studi Analisis Hukum Islam","authors":"Iin Aulia Mahardini, Siti Aisyah","doi":"10.24252/shautuna.vi.23856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to analyze how the feminist legal theory in the Supreme Court Regulation number 3 of 2017 concerning guidelines for adjudicating women's cases in conflict with the law (analytic study of Islamic law). In answering the problems above, the author uses library research which is guided by the processing of data obtained from several literatures. The sources of data obtained include secondary and primary data. This research approach using a qualitative approach is something that is based on a literature study by exploring scientific works that are directly related to the object being studied and analyzing in the literature that has relevance to the problem being discussed, then reviewing and then concludin. The results of this study are how then the urgency of feminist legal theory in adjudicating women's cases against the law. The series of law enforcement processes from investigation, prosecution, to trial in court must comply with the reasoning of the laws and regulations. However, conformity with statutory regulations is not enough, because often court decisions that are in accordance with statutory regulations fail to fulfill a sense of justice and do not even reach the truth of a logical truth. The general character of law formation is often not based on the experience of women and its formulation is more on the granting of power to suppress others, including against women. This is inseparable from the construction of patriarchal ideology and culture","PeriodicalId":321272,"journal":{"name":"Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.vi.23856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to analyze how the feminist legal theory in the Supreme Court Regulation number 3 of 2017 concerning guidelines for adjudicating women's cases in conflict with the law (analytic study of Islamic law). In answering the problems above, the author uses library research which is guided by the processing of data obtained from several literatures. The sources of data obtained include secondary and primary data. This research approach using a qualitative approach is something that is based on a literature study by exploring scientific works that are directly related to the object being studied and analyzing in the literature that has relevance to the problem being discussed, then reviewing and then concludin. The results of this study are how then the urgency of feminist legal theory in adjudicating women's cases against the law. The series of law enforcement processes from investigation, prosecution, to trial in court must comply with the reasoning of the laws and regulations. However, conformity with statutory regulations is not enough, because often court decisions that are in accordance with statutory regulations fail to fulfill a sense of justice and do not even reach the truth of a logical truth. The general character of law formation is often not based on the experience of women and its formulation is more on the granting of power to suppress others, including against women. This is inseparable from the construction of patriarchal ideology and culture
本文旨在分析最高法院2017年第3号关于裁决与法律冲突的妇女案件的指导方针的女权主义法律理论(伊斯兰法的分析研究)。在回答上述问题时,作者采用了图书馆研究的方法,并在对多篇文献资料进行处理的指导下进行了研究。获得的数据来源包括次要数据和主要数据。这种使用定性方法的研究方法是基于文献研究,通过探索与被研究对象直接相关的科学作品,并在与所讨论的问题相关的文献中进行分析,然后回顾,然后得出结论。本文的研究结果说明了女性主义法学理论在女性案件的法律裁判中的紧迫性。从侦查、起诉到法庭审判的一系列执法过程必须符合法律法规的推理。然而,仅仅符合法定规定是不够的,因为法院的判决往往是符合法定规定的,不能实现正义感,甚至不能达到逻辑真理的真理。法律形成的一般特征往往不是基于妇女的经验,其制定更多地是基于授予压制他人的权力,包括对妇女的压制。这与男权思想文化的建构是分不开的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信