The Laparoscopic Approach in the Treatment of Distal Colorectal Cancer

A. Lebedyev, D. Urban, D. Rosin, A. Ayalon, D. Aderka, M. Gutman, O. Zmora
{"title":"The Laparoscopic Approach in the Treatment of Distal Colorectal Cancer","authors":"A. Lebedyev, D. Urban, D. Rosin, A. Ayalon, D. Aderka, M. Gutman, O. Zmora","doi":"10.2174/1876820201104010013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The use of laparoscopic techniques has been widely accepted for most solid organ malignancies, but its use for distal colorectal cancer is still controversial. The aim of this study is to review our experience with laparoscopic resections of distal colorectal cancer and to assess patients' outcome. Methods: A retrospective chart review of prospectively entered data base was made to identify patients who underwent laparoscopic resections of distal colorectal cancer. Data relative to demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical proce- dure and adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment were recorded. Long term follow up (survival and recurrence) was established from the patients' charts and telephone interviews. Results: 94 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic resections due to distal colorectal cancer. Surgery was in curative intent in 89 cases (95%). Conversion rate was 20%. Four patients (4%) died from different septic complications in the early postoperative period. Complete long term follow up follow up was achieved in 71 (75%) patients. There were no port site metastases. Local recurrence was diagnosed in 3 cases (4%). Twenty one patients (30%) died during this period, 11 due to metastatic disease, 1 from pneumonia, 9 patients from other non cancer related reasons. Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery may be safe and feasible for the treatment of distal colorectal cancer with acceptable long term oncologic results. The complexity of the procedure as well as the level of anastomosis results in relatively high complication rate, which may potentially improve by overcoming the \"institutional learning curve\". Randomized con- trolled trials comparing open and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer should verify these results, before the laparo- scopic approach can be widely recommended.","PeriodicalId":331708,"journal":{"name":"The Open Colorectal Cancer Journal","volume":"4 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Colorectal Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876820201104010013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The use of laparoscopic techniques has been widely accepted for most solid organ malignancies, but its use for distal colorectal cancer is still controversial. The aim of this study is to review our experience with laparoscopic resections of distal colorectal cancer and to assess patients' outcome. Methods: A retrospective chart review of prospectively entered data base was made to identify patients who underwent laparoscopic resections of distal colorectal cancer. Data relative to demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical proce- dure and adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment were recorded. Long term follow up (survival and recurrence) was established from the patients' charts and telephone interviews. Results: 94 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic resections due to distal colorectal cancer. Surgery was in curative intent in 89 cases (95%). Conversion rate was 20%. Four patients (4%) died from different septic complications in the early postoperative period. Complete long term follow up follow up was achieved in 71 (75%) patients. There were no port site metastases. Local recurrence was diagnosed in 3 cases (4%). Twenty one patients (30%) died during this period, 11 due to metastatic disease, 1 from pneumonia, 9 patients from other non cancer related reasons. Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery may be safe and feasible for the treatment of distal colorectal cancer with acceptable long term oncologic results. The complexity of the procedure as well as the level of anastomosis results in relatively high complication rate, which may potentially improve by overcoming the "institutional learning curve". Randomized con- trolled trials comparing open and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer should verify these results, before the laparo- scopic approach can be widely recommended.
腹腔镜入路治疗远端结直肠癌
目的:腹腔镜技术已被广泛接受用于大多数实体器官恶性肿瘤,但其在远端结直肠癌中的应用仍存在争议。本研究的目的是回顾我们的经验,腹腔镜切除远端结直肠癌和评估患者的结果。方法:对前瞻性输入的数据库进行回顾性图表分析,以确定行腹腔镜下远端结直肠癌切除术的患者。记录了与人口统计学、肿瘤特征、手术方式和辅助或新辅助治疗相关的数据。通过患者病历和电话随访建立长期随访(生存率和复发率)。结果:连续94例患者因远端结直肠癌行腹腔镜切除术。手术治疗89例(95%)。转化率为20%。4例(4%)患者术后早期死于不同的脓毒性并发症。71例(75%)患者完成了长期随访。无端口转移。局部复发3例(4%)。21名患者(30%)在此期间死亡,11名患者死于转移性疾病,1名患者死于肺炎,9名患者死于其他与癌症无关的原因。结论:腹腔镜手术治疗远端结直肠癌安全可行,长期肿瘤学结果可接受。手术的复杂性和吻合程度导致了相对较高的并发症发生率,通过克服“机构学习曲线”可能会有所改善。在腹腔镜手术被广泛推荐之前,比较开放和腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的随机对照试验应该验证这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信