Responsible Investment in China

Qian Li
{"title":"Responsible Investment in China","authors":"Qian Li","doi":"10.4324/9780203104415.CH14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China, officially the People's Republic of China, includes Mainland China and two special administrative regions, Hong Kong and Macao. The political, legal and economic systems of Mainland China are different from those of the special administrative regions. The development stage of responsible investment (RI) in Hong Kong is more advanced than that in Mainland China, while RI in Macau is still under-developed and has rarely been discussed. Therefore, this chapter uses data from Mainland China to avoid ambiguity and maintain clarity.RI in China differs from the conventional definition that incorporates financial objectives with additional considerations of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) criteria into the investment process. In the Chinese context, RI signifies the adoption of four selection criteria – economic indicators, ethics, sustainability and legal issues; hence these criteria represent preferences towards government policy, tax and legal requirements in portfolio selection. RI mutual funds in China can be ESG inclusive, fully integrating ESG criteria into investment, or ESG themed, such as environmentally-friendly funds, low-carbon funds and sustainable investment funds. Besides RI mutual funds, institutional and individual investors can also invest in ESG-themed pension funds, life and property insurance, renewable energies, green projects, etc. Compared with RI mutual funds, RI applied to other asset classes, such as venture capital, hedge fund and private equity, are relatively insignificant. This chapter seeks to provide an overview of RI in China. It begins with a statistical overview of China’s social and economic background in order to provide some thoughts on the driving forces of RI. It is followed by reporting the historical progress and state of the RI market in China and showing the rapid growth of the RI mutual funds industry. It then discusses the practices of RI institutions, aiming to provide a deeper understanding of support and engagement activities in China. It further briefly discusses the most urgent ESG risks, the most risk-exposed industries and the most controversial companies in China. In the end, it provides suggestions to promote the development of RI from both policy and investment perspectives.","PeriodicalId":118874,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203104415.CH14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

China, officially the People's Republic of China, includes Mainland China and two special administrative regions, Hong Kong and Macao. The political, legal and economic systems of Mainland China are different from those of the special administrative regions. The development stage of responsible investment (RI) in Hong Kong is more advanced than that in Mainland China, while RI in Macau is still under-developed and has rarely been discussed. Therefore, this chapter uses data from Mainland China to avoid ambiguity and maintain clarity.RI in China differs from the conventional definition that incorporates financial objectives with additional considerations of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) criteria into the investment process. In the Chinese context, RI signifies the adoption of four selection criteria – economic indicators, ethics, sustainability and legal issues; hence these criteria represent preferences towards government policy, tax and legal requirements in portfolio selection. RI mutual funds in China can be ESG inclusive, fully integrating ESG criteria into investment, or ESG themed, such as environmentally-friendly funds, low-carbon funds and sustainable investment funds. Besides RI mutual funds, institutional and individual investors can also invest in ESG-themed pension funds, life and property insurance, renewable energies, green projects, etc. Compared with RI mutual funds, RI applied to other asset classes, such as venture capital, hedge fund and private equity, are relatively insignificant. This chapter seeks to provide an overview of RI in China. It begins with a statistical overview of China’s social and economic background in order to provide some thoughts on the driving forces of RI. It is followed by reporting the historical progress and state of the RI market in China and showing the rapid growth of the RI mutual funds industry. It then discusses the practices of RI institutions, aiming to provide a deeper understanding of support and engagement activities in China. It further briefly discusses the most urgent ESG risks, the most risk-exposed industries and the most controversial companies in China. In the end, it provides suggestions to promote the development of RI from both policy and investment perspectives.
中国的负责任投资
中国,正式名称为中华人民共和国,包括中国大陆和两个特别行政区,香港和澳门。中国内地的政治、法律和经济制度与特别行政区不同。香港的责任投资(responsible investment, RI)发展阶段比中国内地更先进,而澳门的责任投资仍处于欠发达阶段,很少被讨论。因此,本章使用来自中国大陆的数据,以避免歧义,保持清晰。中国的RI不同于传统的定义,后者将财务目标与环境、社会和公司治理(ESG)标准的额外考虑纳入投资过程。在中国的背景下,国际扶轮意味着采用四个选择标准-经济指标,道德,可持续性和法律问题;因此,这些标准代表了在投资组合选择中对政府政策、税收和法律要求的偏好。中国的RI共同基金可以是ESG包容性的,将ESG标准充分融入到投资中,或者以ESG为主题,如环保基金、低碳基金和可持续投资基金。除了国际扶轮共同基金,机构和个人投资者还可以投资esg主题的养老基金、人寿和财产保险、可再生能源、绿色项目等。与RI共同基金相比,RI应用于其他资产类别,如风险投资、对冲基金和私募股权,相对微不足道。本章旨在提供国际扶轮在中国的概览。它以中国社会和经济背景的统计概述开始,以便提供一些关于国际扶轮驱动力的想法。其次,报告了中国RI市场的历史进展和现状,并展示了RI共同基金行业的快速增长。然后讨论国际扶轮机构的实践,旨在提供对在中国的支持和参与活动的更深入的了解。并进一步简要讨论了中国最紧迫的ESG风险、风险敞口最大的行业和最具争议的公司。最后,从政策和投资两方面提出了促进国际扶轮发展的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信