Participatory documentation: a case study & rationale

E. A. Pitts
{"title":"Participatory documentation: a case study & rationale","authors":"E. A. Pitts","doi":"10.1145/2507065.2507092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This poster focuses on how consumers learn to use marketing automation software, what types of documentation they prefer, and why. Interviews with U.S. and U.K. marketers demonstrate that implementing marketing automation software requires users to re-learn their jobs, and requires companies to reconfigure organizational structures and workflows. Accordingly, users are interested in knowing how counterparts apply the software, despite raising concerns about privacy. Based on these findings, the poster illustrates the advantages that software companies - especially those operating on a Waterfall development model - can gain by allowing users to participate in creating and refining documentation. In addition to reducing the learning curve for users, participatory documentation enables companies to gather feedback that is critical to making documentation and software more usable.","PeriodicalId":447848,"journal":{"name":"ACM International Conference on Design of Communication","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM International Conference on Design of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2507065.2507092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This poster focuses on how consumers learn to use marketing automation software, what types of documentation they prefer, and why. Interviews with U.S. and U.K. marketers demonstrate that implementing marketing automation software requires users to re-learn their jobs, and requires companies to reconfigure organizational structures and workflows. Accordingly, users are interested in knowing how counterparts apply the software, despite raising concerns about privacy. Based on these findings, the poster illustrates the advantages that software companies - especially those operating on a Waterfall development model - can gain by allowing users to participate in creating and refining documentation. In addition to reducing the learning curve for users, participatory documentation enables companies to gather feedback that is critical to making documentation and software more usable.
参与式文档:案例研究和基本原理
这张海报的重点是消费者如何学习使用营销自动化软件,他们喜欢什么类型的文档,以及为什么。对美国和英国营销人员的采访表明,实施营销自动化软件需要用户重新学习他们的工作,也需要公司重新配置组织结构和工作流程。因此,用户对了解同行如何使用该软件很感兴趣,尽管这引起了对隐私的担忧。基于这些发现,海报说明了软件公司——尤其是那些使用瀑布开发模型的公司——可以通过允许用户参与创建和改进文档而获得的优势。除了减少用户的学习曲线之外,参与式文档还使公司能够收集反馈,这些反馈对于使文档和软件更可用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信