Recent Operational Experience of Pressurized Water Reactor Safety Injection and Drain Line Cracking and Supporting Flaw Evaluations

G. Imbrogno, S. Marlette, Alexandria M. Carolan, A. Udyawar, M. Gray
{"title":"Recent Operational Experience of Pressurized Water Reactor Safety Injection and Drain Line Cracking and Supporting Flaw Evaluations","authors":"G. Imbrogno, S. Marlette, Alexandria M. Carolan, A. Udyawar, M. Gray","doi":"10.1115/pvp2019-93945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A recent increase in operating experience (OE) related to pipe cracking in non-isolable auxiliary piping systems has been realized in the Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) nuclear power industry. The majority of PWR auxiliary piping systems are comprised of welded stainless steel pipe and piping components. The susceptible piping systems are Class 1 pressure boundary and typically non-isolable from the primary loop. Since they are non-isolable, when a pipe crack or crack indication is identified, an emergent flaw evaluation and/or repair is required.\n Typically, the evaluations begin with an ASME Section XI IWB-3640 flaw evaluation to determine acceptability of the as-found flaw at the time of shutdown. Subsequent flaw evaluations are performed to demonstrate the possibility of continued operation of the piping component by leaving the flaw as-is without repair. The flaw tolerance evaluation considers the applicable piping geometry, materials, loadings, crack growth evaluations, and the detection capabilities of the non-destructive examination technique. If evaluation of the as-found indication does not produce acceptable results, then a repair/replacement activity per ASME Section XI is considered. Possible repair scenarios include replacement of the piping section or component, or structural weld overlay. The results of the flaw evaluations or repairs must ensure that the auxiliary piping system will continue to operate safely.\n This paper will discuss the recent experiences of two different piping systems (boron injection tank line and drain line) that experienced cracking, the potential causes for the cracking in the absence of evidence, and the ASME Code flaw evaluations and/or repairs performed to support continued operation of the plant.","PeriodicalId":150804,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3: Design and Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3: Design and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2019-93945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A recent increase in operating experience (OE) related to pipe cracking in non-isolable auxiliary piping systems has been realized in the Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) nuclear power industry. The majority of PWR auxiliary piping systems are comprised of welded stainless steel pipe and piping components. The susceptible piping systems are Class 1 pressure boundary and typically non-isolable from the primary loop. Since they are non-isolable, when a pipe crack or crack indication is identified, an emergent flaw evaluation and/or repair is required. Typically, the evaluations begin with an ASME Section XI IWB-3640 flaw evaluation to determine acceptability of the as-found flaw at the time of shutdown. Subsequent flaw evaluations are performed to demonstrate the possibility of continued operation of the piping component by leaving the flaw as-is without repair. The flaw tolerance evaluation considers the applicable piping geometry, materials, loadings, crack growth evaluations, and the detection capabilities of the non-destructive examination technique. If evaluation of the as-found indication does not produce acceptable results, then a repair/replacement activity per ASME Section XI is considered. Possible repair scenarios include replacement of the piping section or component, or structural weld overlay. The results of the flaw evaluations or repairs must ensure that the auxiliary piping system will continue to operate safely. This paper will discuss the recent experiences of two different piping systems (boron injection tank line and drain line) that experienced cracking, the potential causes for the cracking in the absence of evidence, and the ASME Code flaw evaluations and/or repairs performed to support continued operation of the plant.
压水堆安全注入和排放管线开裂及配套缺陷评价的近期运行经验
近年来,在压水堆(PWR)核电工业中,与非隔离辅助管道系统管道开裂相关的操作经验(OE)有所增加。大多数压水堆辅助管道系统由焊接不锈钢管和管道部件组成。易受影响的管道系统是1级压力边界,通常与主回路不可隔离。由于它们是不可隔离的,当管道裂缝或裂缝迹象被识别时,需要紧急缺陷评估和/或修复。随后进行缺陷评估,以证明在不修复缺陷的情况下,管道部件继续运行的可能性。缺陷容限评估考虑了适用的管道几何形状、材料、载荷、裂纹扩展评估以及无损检测技术的检测能力。可能的修复方案包括更换管道部分或部件,或结构焊缝覆盖层。缺陷评估或修复的结果必须确保辅助管道系统将继续安全运行。本文将讨论两种不同的管道系统(注硼罐管道和排水管道)最近发生裂缝的经验,在没有证据的情况下裂缝的潜在原因,以及为支持工厂继续运行而进行的ASME规范缺陷评估和/或修复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信