Bias does not equal bias: a socio-technical typology of bias in data-based algorithmic systems

Paola Lopez
{"title":"Bias does not equal bias: a socio-technical typology of bias in data-based algorithmic systems","authors":"Paola Lopez","doi":"10.14763/2021.4.1598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This paper introduces a socio-technical typology of bias in data-driven machine learning and artificial intelligence systems. The typology is linked to the conceptualisations of legal antidiscrimination regulations, so that the concept of structural inequality—and, therefore, of undesirable bias—is defined accordingly. By analysing the controversial Austrian “AMS algorithm” as a case study as well as examples in the contexts of face detection, risk assessment and health care management, this paper defines the following three types of bias: firstly, purely technical bias as a systematic deviation of the datafied version of a phenomenon from reality; secondly, socio-technical bias as a systematic deviation due to structural inequalities, which must be strictly distinguished from, thirdly, societal bias, which depicts—correctly—the structural inequalities that prevail in society. This paper argues that a clear distinction must be made between different concepts of bias in such systems in order to analytically assess these systems and, subsequently, inform political action.","PeriodicalId":219999,"journal":{"name":"Internet Policy Rev.","volume":"269 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Policy Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.4.1598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

: This paper introduces a socio-technical typology of bias in data-driven machine learning and artificial intelligence systems. The typology is linked to the conceptualisations of legal antidiscrimination regulations, so that the concept of structural inequality—and, therefore, of undesirable bias—is defined accordingly. By analysing the controversial Austrian “AMS algorithm” as a case study as well as examples in the contexts of face detection, risk assessment and health care management, this paper defines the following three types of bias: firstly, purely technical bias as a systematic deviation of the datafied version of a phenomenon from reality; secondly, socio-technical bias as a systematic deviation due to structural inequalities, which must be strictly distinguished from, thirdly, societal bias, which depicts—correctly—the structural inequalities that prevail in society. This paper argues that a clear distinction must be made between different concepts of bias in such systems in order to analytically assess these systems and, subsequently, inform political action.
偏见不等于偏见:基于数据的算法系统中偏见的社会技术类型
本文介绍了数据驱动的机器学习和人工智能系统中偏见的社会技术类型。该类型学与法律反歧视法规的概念化相关联,因此结构不平等的概念-因此,不受欢迎的偏见-被相应地定义。本文通过分析备受争议的奥地利“AMS算法”作为案例研究,以及在人脸检测、风险评估和医疗保健管理背景下的例子,定义了以下三种类型的偏见:首先,纯技术偏见是一种现象的数据化版本与现实的系统偏差;其次,社会技术偏见是由于结构性不平等造成的系统性偏差,必须严格区分,第三,社会偏见,它正确地描述了社会中普遍存在的结构性不平等。本文认为,必须明确区分这些系统中的不同偏见概念,以便对这些系统进行分析性评估,并随后为政治行动提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信