Studying Secure Coding in the Laboratory: Why, What, Where, How, and Who?

Ita Ryan, Klaas-Jan Stol, U. Roedig
{"title":"Studying Secure Coding in the Laboratory: Why, What, Where, How, and Who?","authors":"Ita Ryan, Klaas-Jan Stol, U. Roedig","doi":"10.1109/EnCyCriS59249.2023.00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software security is an area of growing concern, with over 192,000 known vulnerabilities in public software at the time of writing. Many aids to secure coding exist. Assessing the effectiveness of such aids in a laboratory environment is difficult. There are a number of concerns to address, such as recruitment issues and the level of instrumentation needed to perform an accurate measurement. Based on an extensive literature review of software development aids, we describe recent approaches to running laboratory studies, their characteristics, and their benefits and drawbacks. This paper should be of use to anyone planning to undertake coding studies with software developers.","PeriodicalId":198704,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on Engineering and Cybersecurity of Critical Systems (EnCyCriS)","volume":"241 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on Engineering and Cybersecurity of Critical Systems (EnCyCriS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EnCyCriS59249.2023.00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Software security is an area of growing concern, with over 192,000 known vulnerabilities in public software at the time of writing. Many aids to secure coding exist. Assessing the effectiveness of such aids in a laboratory environment is difficult. There are a number of concerns to address, such as recruitment issues and the level of instrumentation needed to perform an accurate measurement. Based on an extensive literature review of software development aids, we describe recent approaches to running laboratory studies, their characteristics, and their benefits and drawbacks. This paper should be of use to anyone planning to undertake coding studies with software developers.
在实验室研究安全编码:为什么,什么,在哪里,怎么做,谁?
软件安全是一个日益受到关注的领域,在撰写本文时,公共软件中已知的漏洞超过192,000个。有许多安全编码的辅助工具。在实验室环境中评估这些辅助工具的有效性是困难的。有许多问题需要解决,例如招聘问题和执行精确测量所需的仪器水平。基于对软件开发辅助工具的广泛文献回顾,我们描述了运行实验室研究的最新方法,它们的特点,以及它们的优点和缺点。这篇论文应该对任何计划与软件开发人员一起进行编码研究的人都有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信