An Allocation Method for Balancing Prognostic Variables Including Continuous Ones among Treatment Groups Using the Kullback-Leibler Information

Akira Endo, C. Hamada, I. Yoshimura
{"title":"An Allocation Method for Balancing Prognostic Variables Including Continuous Ones among Treatment Groups Using the Kullback-Leibler Information","authors":"Akira Endo, C. Hamada, I. Yoshimura","doi":"10.5691/JJB.27.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose an allocation method for balancing prognostic variables among treatment groups in clinical trials under the condition that some prognostic variables are continuous and others are categorical. In principle, the proposed method utilizes the sum Sr, with respect to groups, of the Kullback-Leibler information (KLI) from the group-pooled distribution of prognostic variables to the group-specific distribution as the criterion for overall balancing, assuming normal and multinomial distributions, respectively. In the realized procedure, the proposed method allocates sequentially enrolled new subjects to a group with probability Pa so as to achieve the minimum of Sr under the condition that the maximum difference of the number of subjects among groups is in the prespecified allowable range DN . Monte-Carlo simulation studies were conducted in order to compare the performance of the proposed method with the Pocock-Simon method which was the most popular method. The homogeneity test of mean and variance among groups for evaluating the achieved balance showed greater P values in the proposed method than those in the Pocock-Simon method. The parameter estimates of treatment effect adjusted for prognostic variables were also likely to be more stable in the proposed method than in the Pocock-Simon method.","PeriodicalId":365545,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of biometrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5691/JJB.27.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose an allocation method for balancing prognostic variables among treatment groups in clinical trials under the condition that some prognostic variables are continuous and others are categorical. In principle, the proposed method utilizes the sum Sr, with respect to groups, of the Kullback-Leibler information (KLI) from the group-pooled distribution of prognostic variables to the group-specific distribution as the criterion for overall balancing, assuming normal and multinomial distributions, respectively. In the realized procedure, the proposed method allocates sequentially enrolled new subjects to a group with probability Pa so as to achieve the minimum of Sr under the condition that the maximum difference of the number of subjects among groups is in the prespecified allowable range DN . Monte-Carlo simulation studies were conducted in order to compare the performance of the proposed method with the Pocock-Simon method which was the most popular method. The homogeneity test of mean and variance among groups for evaluating the achieved balance showed greater P values in the proposed method than those in the Pocock-Simon method. The parameter estimates of treatment effect adjusted for prognostic variables were also likely to be more stable in the proposed method than in the Pocock-Simon method.
一种利用Kullback-Leibler信息平衡治疗组间包括连续预后变量的分配方法
我们提出了一种分配方法来平衡临床试验中治疗组之间的预后变量,其中一些预后变量是连续的,而另一些是分类的。原则上,所提出的方法利用从预测变量的组池分布到组特定分布的Kullback-Leibler信息(KLI)相对于组的总和Sr作为总体平衡的标准,分别假设正态分布和多项分布。在实现的过程中,该方法以概率Pa将顺序招募的新受试者分配到一个组中,在组间受试者人数最大差值在预先规定的允许范围DN内的条件下,使Sr最小。为了与目前最流行的Pocock-Simon方法进行性能比较,我们进行了蒙特卡罗仿真研究。评价达到平衡的组间均数和方差的齐性检验表明,本文方法的P值大于Pocock-Simon方法。根据预后变量调整后的治疗效果参数估计值也可能比Pocock-Simon方法更稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信