Making winners for both education and research: Verification and validation process improvement practice in a software engineering course

Qi Li, B. Boehm
{"title":"Making winners for both education and research: Verification and validation process improvement practice in a software engineering course","authors":"Qi Li, B. Boehm","doi":"10.1109/CSEET.2011.5876100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An empirical study is provided on teaching Verification & Validation (V&V) process practice in a real-client graduate level software engineering course which makes students and researchers mutual winners. From our observation and experiences during the course, on the education side, several reflection-in-action techniques are used to educate and train students. These include inspections, architecture review boards, grading criteria, monitoring of their quality management plans, student critiques of their project experiences, and client evaluations. On the research side, students' feedback, evaluation, and critiques provide not only previous empirical evidence for the researchers' research proposal, but also great opportunities to refine their research methods from lessons learned from the course, and in turn to improve the course quality.","PeriodicalId":318528,"journal":{"name":"2011 24th IEEE-CS Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 24th IEEE-CS Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2011.5876100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

An empirical study is provided on teaching Verification & Validation (V&V) process practice in a real-client graduate level software engineering course which makes students and researchers mutual winners. From our observation and experiences during the course, on the education side, several reflection-in-action techniques are used to educate and train students. These include inspections, architecture review boards, grading criteria, monitoring of their quality management plans, student critiques of their project experiences, and client evaluations. On the research side, students' feedback, evaluation, and critiques provide not only previous empirical evidence for the researchers' research proposal, but also great opportunities to refine their research methods from lessons learned from the course, and in turn to improve the course quality.
为教育和研究创造赢家:软件工程课程中的验证和确认过程改进实践
本文对研究生阶段软件工程课程中教学验证与验证(V&V)过程的实践进行了实证研究,以实现学生与研究者的双赢。从我们在课程中的观察和经验来看,在教育方面,我们采用了几种“行动中反思”的方法来教育和训练学生。这些包括检查、架构审查委员会、分级标准、质量管理计划的监控、学生对项目经验的评论以及客户评估。在研究方面,学生的反馈、评价和批评不仅为研究人员的研究计划提供了先前的经验证据,而且为从课程中吸取的经验教训中改进研究方法提供了很好的机会,从而提高了课程质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信