Directions, Examples, and Incentives: Slovenian Playwriting in the Second Half of the Eighteenth Century

Igor Grdina
{"title":"Directions, Examples, and Incentives: Slovenian Playwriting in the Second Half of the Eighteenth Century","authors":"Igor Grdina","doi":"10.1515/9783110536690-013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Around 1860 two distinguished Slovenian cultural and political figures discussed matters of a literary nature and national importance. One of them, the young and ambitious liberal Josip Vošnjak (1834–1911), had taken up writing a verse drama; the other, the somewhat older conservative Luka Svetec (1826– 1921), thought it was too soon for such an endeavor.1 In his opinion (which had been molded by the lyceum of the Austrian type) drama was the epitome of literature. Due to the complexity of its structure, the concentrated matter, and the necessary staging (i.e., all that went into a developed theater infrastructure), the tested capacity for reproduction, and the suitably cultured audience, drama always held a particularly representative place in the imagery and ideology of any Central European national space, transcending the artistic sphere. Impressive theatrical buildings of the nineteenth century, which were usually built in a historicizing fashion, were a monument of a sort to this very conception. They were meant to create an impression that it had always been thus. However, only three generations earlier – a mere century – drama and theater were not concerned with such preconceptions. For Slovenes, who, as a modern national community, had not established themselves along the historicizing lines of a grand tradition and its associated appeal, but rather with a vision of an emancipated future, the forgetting of the past in the nineteenth century was somewhat understandable. Nationalistic leaders who often felt compelled to create dramatic oeuvres, thus expressing their cultural and political leadership and imposing personalities, found it helpful (at least initially) to treat the past as needing denial – and only denial. It was only later that they were able to acknowledge that they were not in fact the first to have done everything. Josip Vošnjak thus wrote a theatrical piece at the pinnacle of his career in which he quoted the entire comedy Županova Micka (Micka, the Mayor’s Daughter) by Anton Tomaž Linhart (1756–1795) of 1789, adding an introduction and an ending which addressed the circumstances in which the comedy was premiered.2","PeriodicalId":395337,"journal":{"name":"Poetics and Politics","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poetics and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110536690-013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Around 1860 two distinguished Slovenian cultural and political figures discussed matters of a literary nature and national importance. One of them, the young and ambitious liberal Josip Vošnjak (1834–1911), had taken up writing a verse drama; the other, the somewhat older conservative Luka Svetec (1826– 1921), thought it was too soon for such an endeavor.1 In his opinion (which had been molded by the lyceum of the Austrian type) drama was the epitome of literature. Due to the complexity of its structure, the concentrated matter, and the necessary staging (i.e., all that went into a developed theater infrastructure), the tested capacity for reproduction, and the suitably cultured audience, drama always held a particularly representative place in the imagery and ideology of any Central European national space, transcending the artistic sphere. Impressive theatrical buildings of the nineteenth century, which were usually built in a historicizing fashion, were a monument of a sort to this very conception. They were meant to create an impression that it had always been thus. However, only three generations earlier – a mere century – drama and theater were not concerned with such preconceptions. For Slovenes, who, as a modern national community, had not established themselves along the historicizing lines of a grand tradition and its associated appeal, but rather with a vision of an emancipated future, the forgetting of the past in the nineteenth century was somewhat understandable. Nationalistic leaders who often felt compelled to create dramatic oeuvres, thus expressing their cultural and political leadership and imposing personalities, found it helpful (at least initially) to treat the past as needing denial – and only denial. It was only later that they were able to acknowledge that they were not in fact the first to have done everything. Josip Vošnjak thus wrote a theatrical piece at the pinnacle of his career in which he quoted the entire comedy Županova Micka (Micka, the Mayor’s Daughter) by Anton Tomaž Linhart (1756–1795) of 1789, adding an introduction and an ending which addressed the circumstances in which the comedy was premiered.2
方向、范例与激励:18世纪下半叶斯洛文尼亚的戏剧创作
大约在1860年,两位杰出的斯洛文尼亚文化和政治人物讨论了具有文学性质和国家重要性的问题。其中一个,年轻而雄心勃勃的自由主义者约瑟普Vošnjak(1834-1911),已经开始写诗剧;另一位是年纪稍大的保守主义者卢卡·斯维特克(Luka Svetec, 1826 - 1921),他认为现在进行这种努力还为时过早在他看来,戏剧是文学的缩影(他的观点是受奥地利学派教育的影响而形成的)。由于其结构的复杂性,集中的内容,必要的舞台(即所有进入发达剧院基础设施的内容),经过测试的复制能力,以及适当的文化观众,戏剧在任何中欧国家空间的意象和意识形态中始终具有特别的代表性,超越了艺术领域。19世纪令人印象深刻的剧院建筑,通常是以一种历史性的方式建造的,在某种程度上是这种观念的纪念碑。他们的目的是制造一种印象,让人觉得一直都是这样。然而,仅仅在三代人之前——仅仅一个世纪——戏剧和戏剧与这种先入为主的观念无关。对于斯洛文尼亚人来说,作为一个现代民族共同体,他们并没有沿着伟大传统及其相关吸引力的历史化路线建立自己,而是以一种解放的未来的愿景,19世纪对过去的遗忘在某种程度上是可以理解的。民族主义领导人经常感到有必要创作戏剧性的作品,从而表现他们的文化和政治领导地位以及令人印象深刻的个性,他们发现(至少在最初)将过去视为需要否认的——而且只需要否认——是有帮助的。直到后来,他们才认识到,事实上,他们并不是第一个把所有事情都做完的人。因此,约瑟夫Vošnjak在他事业的巅峰时期写了一部戏剧作品,他在其中引用了安东·托马佐夫·林哈特(1756-1795)1789年创作的喜剧《Županova米卡》(米卡,市长的女儿)的全部内容,并添加了介绍和结尾,说明了这部喜剧的首映环境
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信