Transparency in Drug Submission Processes of 3 Asian Countries: A Survey of Industry Views

Martin Solberg, Frances J. Richmond
{"title":"Transparency in Drug Submission Processes of 3 Asian Countries: A Survey of Industry Views","authors":"Martin Solberg, Frances J. Richmond","doi":"10.1177/0092861512436583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated drug-registration transparency in 3 Pharmerging markets, South Korea, China and India, using the US as a comparator. Focus group methods were used to identify factors perceived by regulatory experts as important in defining transparency in regulatory agencies. This input was used to guide the development of a survey to evaluate drug-registration transparency, which was administered to 64 regulatory professionals responsible for international drug registration. Respondents viewed the US as most transparent, South Korea as intermediate in transparency, and China and India as least transparent. The survey instrument appears to provide a novel way to study regulatory transparency, based on 3 key aspects of transparency: clarity, accessibility, and accountability. With minor change, it could be adapted to study the transparency of more countries and product categories including medical devices and in vitro diagnostics.","PeriodicalId":391574,"journal":{"name":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861512436583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study evaluated drug-registration transparency in 3 Pharmerging markets, South Korea, China and India, using the US as a comparator. Focus group methods were used to identify factors perceived by regulatory experts as important in defining transparency in regulatory agencies. This input was used to guide the development of a survey to evaluate drug-registration transparency, which was administered to 64 regulatory professionals responsible for international drug registration. Respondents viewed the US as most transparent, South Korea as intermediate in transparency, and China and India as least transparent. The survey instrument appears to provide a novel way to study regulatory transparency, based on 3 key aspects of transparency: clarity, accessibility, and accountability. With minor change, it could be adapted to study the transparency of more countries and product categories including medical devices and in vitro diagnostics.
3个亚洲国家药品申报过程的透明度:行业观点调查
本研究以美国为对照,评估了韩国、中国和印度这三个新兴市场的药品注册透明度。使用焦点小组方法确定监管专家认为在定义监管机构透明度方面重要的因素。这一投入用于指导开展一项评估药物注册透明度的调查,该调查对64名负责国际药物注册的监管专业人员进行了管理。受访者认为美国最透明,韩国透明度中等,中国和印度透明度最低。调查工具似乎提供了一种研究监管透明度的新方法,基于透明度的三个关键方面:清晰度、可及性和问责制。只要稍加改动,它就可以适用于研究更多国家和产品类别的透明度,包括医疗设备和体外诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信