Introduction: ageing in place in the Western Asia-Pacific

B. Judd, Edgar Liu, K. Tanoue
{"title":"Introduction: ageing in place in the Western Asia-Pacific","authors":"B. Judd, Edgar Liu, K. Tanoue","doi":"10.4337/9781788976091.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Population ageing is an international phenomenon (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs [UN], 2017) with profound social and economic implications (Harper, 2014; Rouzet et al., 2019; World Health Organization [WHO], 2015) and the nature of the built environment at various scales is critical to optimizing the social participation and well-being of older people, who increasingly comprise larger shares of the population. It is, however, occurring at different rates in different countries, eliciting policy responses reflecting local cultural, political and economic settings (UN, 2017). A common response of governments is to move toward policies that encourage ageing in place in one’s own home and community for as long as possible in order to reserve more costly institutional care for those with higher needs such as frailty and dementia (Philips, Ajrough and Hillcoat-Nallétamby, 2010). It is often seen as a win–win policy, favoured by governments because of the potential cost savings to counter increasing dependency ratios as well as by the majority of older people themselves who prefer to remain independent and engaged with their communities in their later years. It is also argued that remaining in one’s own home and maintaining active involvement in a familiar community can contribute to positive health and well-being in older age (WHO, 2015). However, successful ageing in place is only possible with access to appropriate care services and a supportive built environment. The focus of this book is on ageing-in-place policies and practice in the Western Asia-Pacific, particularly in relation to policies and practice regarding the built environment. This corresponds with the Western Pacific Region as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO, 2020a), which extends from Japan in the north to New Zealand in the south and from China in the west to the many small island nations in the western Pacific Ocean. Our particular focus is on Japan and China (including Hong Kong and Taiwan) in the northern hemisphere, and Australia and New Zealand in the southern hemisphere, both of which have increasingly been seen as part of Asia given their geographic location in the Western Pacific Region, the importance of trade relationships with East Asian countries, and increasing Asian immigration. There are a number of reasons for this focus on ageing in place in the Western Asia-Pacific. First, Asia includes the country with the most advanced ageing internationally (Japan), and another (China) with the highest total population that is on a very steep ageing trajectory, both requiring sustained policy responses in the face of a breakdown in family support and care traditions (Chang, 2014; Miyanaga, 1993; Rein, 2014). Second, the bulk of the existing","PeriodicalId":434376,"journal":{"name":"Ageing in Place","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing in Place","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788976091.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population ageing is an international phenomenon (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs [UN], 2017) with profound social and economic implications (Harper, 2014; Rouzet et al., 2019; World Health Organization [WHO], 2015) and the nature of the built environment at various scales is critical to optimizing the social participation and well-being of older people, who increasingly comprise larger shares of the population. It is, however, occurring at different rates in different countries, eliciting policy responses reflecting local cultural, political and economic settings (UN, 2017). A common response of governments is to move toward policies that encourage ageing in place in one’s own home and community for as long as possible in order to reserve more costly institutional care for those with higher needs such as frailty and dementia (Philips, Ajrough and Hillcoat-Nallétamby, 2010). It is often seen as a win–win policy, favoured by governments because of the potential cost savings to counter increasing dependency ratios as well as by the majority of older people themselves who prefer to remain independent and engaged with their communities in their later years. It is also argued that remaining in one’s own home and maintaining active involvement in a familiar community can contribute to positive health and well-being in older age (WHO, 2015). However, successful ageing in place is only possible with access to appropriate care services and a supportive built environment. The focus of this book is on ageing-in-place policies and practice in the Western Asia-Pacific, particularly in relation to policies and practice regarding the built environment. This corresponds with the Western Pacific Region as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO, 2020a), which extends from Japan in the north to New Zealand in the south and from China in the west to the many small island nations in the western Pacific Ocean. Our particular focus is on Japan and China (including Hong Kong and Taiwan) in the northern hemisphere, and Australia and New Zealand in the southern hemisphere, both of which have increasingly been seen as part of Asia given their geographic location in the Western Pacific Region, the importance of trade relationships with East Asian countries, and increasing Asian immigration. There are a number of reasons for this focus on ageing in place in the Western Asia-Pacific. First, Asia includes the country with the most advanced ageing internationally (Japan), and another (China) with the highest total population that is on a very steep ageing trajectory, both requiring sustained policy responses in the face of a breakdown in family support and care traditions (Chang, 2014; Miyanaga, 1993; Rein, 2014). Second, the bulk of the existing
引言:老龄化在西亚太地区到位
人口老龄化是一种国际现象(联合国经济和社会事务部[UN], 2017),具有深刻的社会和经济影响(Harper, 2014;Rouzet et al., 2019;世界卫生组织[世卫组织],2015年)和各种规模的建筑环境的性质对于优化老年人的社会参与和福祉至关重要,老年人在人口中所占的比例越来越大。然而,它在不同的国家以不同的速度发生,引发反映当地文化、政治和经济环境的政策反应(UN, 2017)。政府的一个共同反应是采取政策,鼓励人们尽可能长时间地在自己的家中和社区养老,以便为那些有更高需求的人(如虚弱和痴呆症)保留更昂贵的机构护理(Philips, Ajrough和hillcoat - nallsamtamby, 2010)。这通常被视为一项双赢的政策,受到政府的青睐,因为这可能节省成本,以应对日益增长的抚养比率,而且大多数老年人自己也喜欢在晚年保持独立,与社区保持联系。还有人认为,留在自己的家中并积极参与熟悉的社区,有助于老年人的健康和福祉(世卫组织,2015年)。然而,只有在获得适当的护理服务和支持性的建筑环境的情况下,才能成功地实现老龄化。本书的重点是西亚太地区的就地老龄化政策和实践,特别是与建筑环境相关的政策和实践。这与世界卫生组织(世卫组织,2020a)所界定的西太平洋区域相一致,该区域北起日本,南至新西兰,西起中国,西至西太平洋的许多小岛国。我们特别关注北半球的日本和中国(包括香港和台湾),南半球的澳大利亚和新西兰,鉴于它们在西太平洋地区的地理位置、与东亚国家贸易关系的重要性以及不断增加的亚洲移民,这两个国家越来越被视为亚洲的一部分。西亚太地区关注老龄化问题的原因有很多。首先,亚洲包括国际上老龄化最严重的国家(日本)和另一个总人口最多、老龄化轨迹非常陡峭的国家(中国),面对家庭支持和护理传统的崩溃,两者都需要持续的政策回应(Chang, 2014;Miyanaga, 1993;控制,2014)。第二,现有的大部分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信