Innovative teaching practices during the emergency remote teaching (ERT) process: a phenomenological inquiry

Tuğba Sadıç, Bünyamin Bavlı
{"title":"Innovative teaching practices during the emergency remote teaching (ERT) process: a phenomenological inquiry","authors":"Tuğba Sadıç, Bünyamin Bavlı","doi":"10.1108/jrit-04-2023-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe Covid-19 period has led to defining changes in the teaching process. Therefore, it is essential to explore how teachers have approached these changes, what experiences they have gained and what they have tried to change. This study aims to elucidate how innovative practices were applied in teaching – which was influenced by emergency remote teaching (ERT) – and better understand teachers' experiences related to these practices.Design/methodology/approachThe phenomenology design, a qualitative research model, was executed in the current study. Phenomenological inquiry aims to interpret people's experiences about a specific concept designated as a phenomenon. Creswell (2020) classified two types of phenomenology: interpretive and descriptive. Interpretive phenomenology was employed in the current study as researchers collected data from individuals experiencing the phenomenon, collected and interpreted the data via excluding their own experiences.FindingsAs a result of the data interpretation, four themes related to experiences of innovative teaching practices during ERT were discovered: interpretation of innovative teaching, innovative teaching practices, needs related to innovative teaching and challenges to innovative teaching. The categories related to the interpretation of innovative teaching include positive and negative interpretation. The categories related to the second theme, innovative teaching practices, consist of characteristics of innovative teachers and innovative teaching practices employed. The categories related to the third theme, needs related to innovative teaching, are the need for guidance, training and technological infrastructure. The categories related to the fourth and final theme, challenges to innovative teaching, are barriers related to the teacher, barriers related to the learner and those related to the environment.Originality/valueThis study discovered that for teachers to practice innovative teaching, they must develop themselves, keep up-to-date and develop lifelong learning skills. Hung and Li (2017) reached a similar conclusion to the findings of this study: teachers' professional development is positively related to innovative teaching skills at a high level. The participating teachers stated that they had to rapidly improve their technological competency. It is thought that teachers developing their technological competencies will contribute to both ERT and face-to-face education at the end of the Pandemic.","PeriodicalId":244951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-04-2023-0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe Covid-19 period has led to defining changes in the teaching process. Therefore, it is essential to explore how teachers have approached these changes, what experiences they have gained and what they have tried to change. This study aims to elucidate how innovative practices were applied in teaching – which was influenced by emergency remote teaching (ERT) – and better understand teachers' experiences related to these practices.Design/methodology/approachThe phenomenology design, a qualitative research model, was executed in the current study. Phenomenological inquiry aims to interpret people's experiences about a specific concept designated as a phenomenon. Creswell (2020) classified two types of phenomenology: interpretive and descriptive. Interpretive phenomenology was employed in the current study as researchers collected data from individuals experiencing the phenomenon, collected and interpreted the data via excluding their own experiences.FindingsAs a result of the data interpretation, four themes related to experiences of innovative teaching practices during ERT were discovered: interpretation of innovative teaching, innovative teaching practices, needs related to innovative teaching and challenges to innovative teaching. The categories related to the interpretation of innovative teaching include positive and negative interpretation. The categories related to the second theme, innovative teaching practices, consist of characteristics of innovative teachers and innovative teaching practices employed. The categories related to the third theme, needs related to innovative teaching, are the need for guidance, training and technological infrastructure. The categories related to the fourth and final theme, challenges to innovative teaching, are barriers related to the teacher, barriers related to the learner and those related to the environment.Originality/valueThis study discovered that for teachers to practice innovative teaching, they must develop themselves, keep up-to-date and develop lifelong learning skills. Hung and Li (2017) reached a similar conclusion to the findings of this study: teachers' professional development is positively related to innovative teaching skills at a high level. The participating teachers stated that they had to rapidly improve their technological competency. It is thought that teachers developing their technological competencies will contribute to both ERT and face-to-face education at the end of the Pandemic.
应急远程教学过程中的创新教学实践:现象学探究
新冠肺炎疫情期间,教学过程发生了重大变化。因此,有必要探讨教师如何应对这些变化,他们获得了什么经验,以及他们试图改变什么。本研究旨在阐明创新实践在应急远程教学(ERT)的影响下如何应用于教学,并更好地了解教师与这些实践相关的经验。设计/方法/方法本研究采用了一种定性研究模型——现象学设计。现象学探究的目的是解释人们对一个被指定为现象的特定概念的体验。Creswell(2020)将现象学分为两类:解释性现象学和描述性现象学。本研究采用解释现象学,研究人员从经历该现象的个体收集数据,通过排除他们自己的经验来收集和解释数据。通过对数据的解读,我们发现了四个与创新教学实践经验相关的主题:创新教学的解读、创新教学实践、创新教学的需求和创新教学面临的挑战。与创新教学解释相关的范畴包括积极解释和消极解释。与第二个主题“创新教学实践”相关的类别包括创新教师的特征和采用的创新教学实践。与第三个主题有关的类别,即与创新教学有关的需求,是对指导、培训和技术基础设施的需求。与第四个也是最后一个主题“创新教学面临的挑战”相关的类别是与教师有关的障碍、与学习者有关的障碍和与环境有关的障碍。创新/价值本研究发现,教师要实施创新教学,必须自我发展、与时俱进、培养终身学习技能。Hung and Li(2017)得出了与本研究结果相似的结论:教师的专业发展在高水平上与创新教学技能呈正相关。参与的教师表示,他们必须迅速提高自己的技术能力。据认为,教师发展其技术能力将有助于大流行结束时的应急教育和面对面教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信