{"title":"Coupled Flow Simulation and Geomechanical Modeling on CO 2 Storage in a Saline Aquifer","authors":"L. Ji","doi":"10.11648/J.EARTH.20180705.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As an option to mitigate the increasing level of greenhouse gas emission, a number of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) testing and pilot projects have been brought up all over the world. In general, there are three types of CO 2 storage formations, such as deep saline aquifers, depleted oil and gas reservoirs, and un-mineable coal seams. This study is focused on the deep saline aquifer which has the largest potential for CO 2 storage. There are a lot of uncertainties associated with this type of storage, such as storage capacity, geomechanical properties, and sealing behaviour of the caprock. Pressure (and temperature) changes during CO 2 injection and storage can have significant impact on the stress and strain field and may cause relevant geomechanical problems. This paper shows a case study of a synthetic saline aquifer storage site, where a 15-year injection at a rate of 15 MT/year was simulated. Sealing performance and leakage risk were evaluated. A number of sensitivity studies were conducted to analyse the impacts of different rock properties on CO 2 leakage potentials. Coupled flow simulation and geomechanical modeling was performed to monitor stress-strain evolutions and to predict failure potentials in response to pressure changes during CO 2 injection and storage. The findings show that CO 2 leakage is most sensitive to caprock permeability. Other factors such as reservoir properties, boundary conditions, and perforation intervals also have certain degree of influence on the leakage. During the 15-year injection, there is no significant risk of potential failure; however, this may happen in local area due to formation heterogeneity.","PeriodicalId":350455,"journal":{"name":"Eearth","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eearth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.EARTH.20180705.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
As an option to mitigate the increasing level of greenhouse gas emission, a number of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) testing and pilot projects have been brought up all over the world. In general, there are three types of CO 2 storage formations, such as deep saline aquifers, depleted oil and gas reservoirs, and un-mineable coal seams. This study is focused on the deep saline aquifer which has the largest potential for CO 2 storage. There are a lot of uncertainties associated with this type of storage, such as storage capacity, geomechanical properties, and sealing behaviour of the caprock. Pressure (and temperature) changes during CO 2 injection and storage can have significant impact on the stress and strain field and may cause relevant geomechanical problems. This paper shows a case study of a synthetic saline aquifer storage site, where a 15-year injection at a rate of 15 MT/year was simulated. Sealing performance and leakage risk were evaluated. A number of sensitivity studies were conducted to analyse the impacts of different rock properties on CO 2 leakage potentials. Coupled flow simulation and geomechanical modeling was performed to monitor stress-strain evolutions and to predict failure potentials in response to pressure changes during CO 2 injection and storage. The findings show that CO 2 leakage is most sensitive to caprock permeability. Other factors such as reservoir properties, boundary conditions, and perforation intervals also have certain degree of influence on the leakage. During the 15-year injection, there is no significant risk of potential failure; however, this may happen in local area due to formation heterogeneity.