Access to and Accounts of Using Digital Tools in Swedish Secondary Grades. An Exploratory Study

Lars Almén, Sangeeta Bagga-Gupta, C. Bjursell
{"title":"Access to and Accounts of Using Digital Tools in Swedish Secondary Grades. An Exploratory Study","authors":"Lars Almén, Sangeeta Bagga-Gupta, C. Bjursell","doi":"10.28945/4550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim/Purpose: The aim of the study is to explore students’ encounters with digital tools and how they account for their experiences of using digital tools within formal education.\n\nBackground: While computers have a long history in educational settings, research indicates that digital tools function both as affordances and constraints, and that the role of digital tools in schools continues to be debated. Taking into consideration student perspectives can broaden the understanding of knowledge formation practices. \n\nMethodology: The study is part of a larger ethnographic project, focusing on agency at all levels with respect to digitalization in schools. The present exploratory study is built primarily on interviews with 31 secondary school students at five different schools (15 girls and 16 boys). The analytical framework was a Nexus Analysis, focusing on discourses in place.\n\nContribution: The paper shows how digital tools are conceptualized as being formed by and fitted into the traditions and habits of the institution, rather than acting as a transformative force to change knowledge formation practices in schools.\n\nFindings: From the students’ narrative accounts, the following key themes emerge: (1) Action in contexts, (2) Agency in contexts, and (3) Equality in contexts. The first deals with the use of digital tools in school and the interaction order as it is accounted for in the use of digital tools in schools. The second frames human agency with regards to usage of digital tools and how agency fluctuates in interaction. The third deals with the compensating role digital tools are supposed to play for students who are identified with special needs and for students with divergent backgrounds, especially socioeconomic standards.\n\nRecommendations for Practitioners: For teachers, the recommendation is to engage in dialogue with the stu-dents on how and when to use digital tools and the affordances and con-straints involved from a student’s point of view. \nFor school leaders, the recommendation is to review how organizational structures, culture, and processes hinder or support the development of new practices in digitalization processes.\n\n\nRecommendation for Researchers: The three key themes that emerged in this study emphasize the need to reflect upon how a panopticon view of contemporary classrooms can be challenged. Involving students in this work is recommended as a means to anchor ideas and results. \n\nImpact on Society: This study is part of a larger project at Jönköping University, focusing on agency at all levels with respect to digitalization in schools. The overall goal is to increase our understanding of how to improve digitalization and implementation processes in schools.\n\nFuture Research: Future studies that address digital technologies in schools need to pay special attention to the interaction between students, teachers, and various kinds of tools to map the nature of the education process, with the aim of challenging the panopticon view of the classroom. Future studies need to focus upon processes themselves, rather than accounts of processes. \n\n","PeriodicalId":220667,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res.","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/4550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: The aim of the study is to explore students’ encounters with digital tools and how they account for their experiences of using digital tools within formal education. Background: While computers have a long history in educational settings, research indicates that digital tools function both as affordances and constraints, and that the role of digital tools in schools continues to be debated. Taking into consideration student perspectives can broaden the understanding of knowledge formation practices. Methodology: The study is part of a larger ethnographic project, focusing on agency at all levels with respect to digitalization in schools. The present exploratory study is built primarily on interviews with 31 secondary school students at five different schools (15 girls and 16 boys). The analytical framework was a Nexus Analysis, focusing on discourses in place. Contribution: The paper shows how digital tools are conceptualized as being formed by and fitted into the traditions and habits of the institution, rather than acting as a transformative force to change knowledge formation practices in schools. Findings: From the students’ narrative accounts, the following key themes emerge: (1) Action in contexts, (2) Agency in contexts, and (3) Equality in contexts. The first deals with the use of digital tools in school and the interaction order as it is accounted for in the use of digital tools in schools. The second frames human agency with regards to usage of digital tools and how agency fluctuates in interaction. The third deals with the compensating role digital tools are supposed to play for students who are identified with special needs and for students with divergent backgrounds, especially socioeconomic standards. Recommendations for Practitioners: For teachers, the recommendation is to engage in dialogue with the stu-dents on how and when to use digital tools and the affordances and con-straints involved from a student’s point of view. For school leaders, the recommendation is to review how organizational structures, culture, and processes hinder or support the development of new practices in digitalization processes. Recommendation for Researchers: The three key themes that emerged in this study emphasize the need to reflect upon how a panopticon view of contemporary classrooms can be challenged. Involving students in this work is recommended as a means to anchor ideas and results. Impact on Society: This study is part of a larger project at Jönköping University, focusing on agency at all levels with respect to digitalization in schools. The overall goal is to increase our understanding of how to improve digitalization and implementation processes in schools. Future Research: Future studies that address digital technologies in schools need to pay special attention to the interaction between students, teachers, and various kinds of tools to map the nature of the education process, with the aim of challenging the panopticon view of the classroom. Future studies need to focus upon processes themselves, rather than accounts of processes.
瑞典中学使用数字工具的途径和记录。一项探索性研究
目的/目的:本研究的目的是探索学生与数字工具的接触,以及他们如何解释自己在正规教育中使用数字工具的经历。背景:虽然计算机在教育环境中有着悠久的历史,但研究表明,数字工具既起着促进作用,也起着制约作用,数字工具在学校中的作用仍在争论中。考虑学生的观点可以拓宽对知识形成实践的理解。方法:该研究是一个更大的民族志项目的一部分,重点关注各级机构在学校数字化方面的工作。目前的探索性研究主要基于对5所不同学校的31名中学生(15名女生和16名男生)的访谈。分析框架是“关联分析”(Nexus Analysis),聚焦于话语的位置。贡献:本文展示了数字工具如何被概念化为由机构的传统和习惯形成并适应这些传统和习惯,而不是作为改变学校知识形成实践的变革力量。调查结果:从学生的叙述中,出现了以下关键主题:(1)情境中的行动,(2)情境中的代理,(3)情境中的平等。第一部分涉及学校中数字工具的使用以及在学校中使用数字工具时所考虑的交互顺序。第二个框架是关于数字工具的使用以及代理如何在互动中波动的人类代理。第三个是关于数字工具应该为那些被认为有特殊需求的学生和背景不同的学生,尤其是社会经济标准不同的学生发挥的补偿作用。对实践者的建议:对于教师,建议是与学生就如何以及何时使用数字工具以及从学生的角度来看所涉及的支持和限制进行对话。对于学校领导来说,建议是审查组织结构、文化和流程如何阻碍或支持数字化过程中新实践的发展。对研究人员的建议:本研究中出现的三个关键主题强调了反思当代教室的圆形监狱观如何受到挑战的必要性。建议让学生参与这项工作,作为巩固思想和结果的一种手段。对社会的影响:这项研究是Jönköping大学一个更大项目的一部分,重点关注各级机构在学校数字化方面的工作。总体目标是增加我们对如何改进学校数字化和实施过程的理解。未来研究:针对学校数字技术的未来研究需要特别关注学生、教师和各种工具之间的互动,以映射教育过程的本质,目的是挑战课堂的圆形监狱观。未来的研究需要关注过程本身,而不是过程的描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信